The strong interaction is governed by the gauge group SU(3) . The eight gluons correspond to the Eight generators of SU(3), the Gell-Mann matrices λ a \lambda^a λ a (a = 1 , … , 8 a = 1, \ldots, 8 a = 1 , … , 8 ).
Colour confinement: All observable particles are colour singlets (SU(3) invariant). This is why Free quarks and gluons are not observed.
Quark colour states: q ∈ 3 q \in \mathbf{3} q ∈ 3 (triplet), q ˉ ∈ 3 ˉ \bar{q} \in \bar{\mathbf{3}} q ˉ ∈ 3 ˉ (antitriplet).
Meson colour wavefunction: q q ˉ ∈ 3 ⊗ 3 ˉ = 8 ⊕ 1 q\bar{q} \in \mathbf{3} \otimes \bar{\mathbf{3}} = \mathbf{8} \oplus \mathbf{1} q q ˉ ∈ 3 ⊗ 3 ˉ = 8 ⊕ 1 . The singlet 1 \mathbf{1} 1 is the colour-neutral meson.
Baryon colour wavefunction: q q q ∈ 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1 qqq \in \mathbf{3} \otimes \mathbf{3} \otimes \mathbf{3} = \mathbf{10} \oplus \mathbf{8} \oplus \mathbf{8} \oplus \mathbf{1} q q q ∈ 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1 . The completely antisymmetric singlet is the colour-neutral baryon.
The eight Gell-Mann matrices λ a \lambda^a λ a are the generators of SU(3) in the fundamental Representation. They satisfy:
[ λ a , λ b ] = 2 i f a b c λ c , T r ( λ a λ b ) = 2 δ a b [\lambda^a, \lambda^b] = 2if^{abc}\lambda^c, \quad \mathrm{Tr}(\lambda^a\lambda^b) = 2\delta^{ab} [ λ a , λ b ] = 2 i f ab c λ c , Tr ( λ a λ b ) = 2 δ ab
Where f a b c f^{abc} f ab c are the totally antisymmetric structure constants of SU(3).
Explicitly:
λ 1 = ( 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ) , λ 2 = ( 0 − i 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 ) , λ 3 = ( 1 0 0 0 − 1 0 0 0 0 ) \lambda^1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \lambda^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i & 0 \\ i & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \lambda^3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} λ 1 = 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 , λ 2 = 0 i 0 − i 0 0 0 0 0 , λ 3 = 1 0 0 0 − 1 0 0 0 0 λ 4 = ( 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 ) , λ 5 = ( 0 0 − i 0 0 0 i 0 0 ) \lambda^4 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \lambda^5 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ i & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} λ 4 = 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 , λ 5 = 0 0 i 0 0 0 − i 0 0 λ 6 = ( 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ) , λ 7 = ( 0 0 0 0 0 − i 0 i 0 ) \lambda^6 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \lambda^7 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & i & 0 \end{pmatrix} λ 6 = 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 , λ 7 = 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 − i 0 λ 8 = 1 3 ( 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 − 2 ) \lambda^8 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 \end{pmatrix} λ 8 = 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 − 2
The normalised generators used in the QCD Lagrangian are T a = λ a / 2 T^a = \lambda^a/2 T a = λ a /2 Satisfying [ T a , T b ] = i f a b c T c [T^a, T^b] = if^{abc}T^c [ T a , T b ] = i f ab c T c and T r ( T a T b ) = δ a b / 2 \mathrm{Tr}(T^a T^b) = \delta^{ab}/2 Tr ( T a T b ) = δ ab /2 .
Example 5.1: Decomposing $3 \otimes \bar{3}$ (mesons) The tensor product 3 ⊗ 3 ˉ \mathbf{3} \otimes \bar{\mathbf{3}} 3 ⊗ 3 ˉ can be decomposed using the Clebsch—Gordan series for SU(3):
3 ⊗ 3 ˉ = 8 ⊕ 1 \mathbf{3} \otimes \bar{\mathbf{3}} = \mathbf{8} \oplus \mathbf{1} 3 ⊗ 3 ˉ = 8 ⊕ 1
The singlet 1 \mathbf{1} 1 corresponds to the colour-neutral state:
1 3 ( r r ˉ + g g ˉ + b b ˉ ) \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(r\bar{r} + g\bar{g} + b\bar{b}) 3 1 ( r r ˉ + g g ˉ + b b ˉ )
This is the unique SU(3)-invariant combination, analogous to the trace of a 3 × 3 3 \times 3 3 × 3 Matrix. The remaining eight independent components form the adjoint representation 8 \mathbf{8} 8 .
For mesons, the colour wavefunction must be the singlet, ensuring colour confinement. The flavour and spin wavefunctions are independent of this colour structure.
Example 5.2: Decomposing $3 \otimes 3 \otimes 3$ (baryons) First decompose two triplets:
3 ⊗ 3 = 6 S ⊕ 3 A \mathbf{3} \otimes \mathbf{3} = \mathbf{6}_S \oplus \mathbf{3}_A 3 ⊗ 3 = 6 S ⊕ 3 A
Where the subscript denotes symmetry (S S S ) or antisymmetry (A A A ) under exchange of the Two quarks.
Then:
3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = ( 6 S ⊕ 3 A ) ⊗ 3 \mathbf{3} \otimes \mathbf{3} \otimes \mathbf{3} = (\mathbf{6}_S \oplus \mathbf{3}_A) \otimes \mathbf{3} 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = ( 6 S ⊕ 3 A ) ⊗ 3
= 6 S ⊗ 3 ⊕ 3 A ⊗ 3 = \mathbf{6}_S \otimes \mathbf{3} \oplus \mathbf{3}_A \otimes \mathbf{3} = 6 S ⊗ 3 ⊕ 3 A ⊗ 3
= ( 10 S ⊕ 8 M ) ⊕ ( 8 M ⊕ 1 A ) = (\mathbf{10}_S \oplus \mathbf{8}_M) \oplus (\mathbf{8}_M \oplus \mathbf{1}_A) = ( 10 S ⊕ 8 M ) ⊕ ( 8 M ⊕ 1 A )
= 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1 = \mathbf{10} \oplus \mathbf{8} \oplus \mathbf{8} \oplus \mathbf{1} = 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1
The completely antisymmetric singlet 1 A \mathbf{1}_A 1 A is the colour wavefunction of all Baryons. In the full baryon wavefunction, the colour part is antisymmetric, so the Combined flavour ⊗ \otimes ⊗ spin ⊗ \otimes ⊗ space part must be symmetric (for ground-state Baryons, L = 0 L = 0 L = 0 So the space part is symmetric).
The electroweak interaction is governed by SU(2)L × _L \times L × U(1)Y _Y Y :
SU(2)L _L L : weak isospin, acts on left-handed doublets only. U(1)Y _Y Y : weak hypercharge, acts on all particles. Left-handed fermions form SU(2) doublets: L = ( ν e e − ) L , Q = ( u d ) L L = \begin{pmatrix} \nu_e \\ e^- \end{pmatrix}_L, \quad Q = \begin{pmatrix} u \\ d \end{pmatrix}_L L = ( ν e e − ) L , Q = ( u d ) L
Right-handed fermions are singlets under SU(2): e R , u R , d R e_R, \quad u_R, \quad d_R e R , u R , d R
The electric charge is: Q = T 3 + Y / 2 Q = T_3 + Y/2 Q = T 3 + Y /2 .
After electroweak symmetry breaking, the W ± W^\pm W ± and Z 0 Z^0 Z 0 bosons and the photon emerge as linear Combinations of the SU(2) and U(1) gauge fields:
W ± = 1 2 ( W 1 ∓ i W 2 ) W^\pm = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(W^1 \mp iW^2) W ± = 2 1 ( W 1 ∓ i W 2 )
( Z 0 A ) = ( cos θ W sin θ W − sin θ W cos θ W ) ( W 3 B ) \begin{pmatrix} Z^0 \\ A \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta_W & \sin\theta_W \\ -\sin\theta_W & \cos\theta_W \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} W^3 \\ B \end{pmatrix} ( Z 0 A ) = ( cos θ W − sin θ W sin θ W cos θ W ) ( W 3 B )
Before QCD, Gell-Mann and Ne”eman organised hadrons using approximate SU(3) flavour symmetry:
Meson octet: π + , π 0 , π − , K + , K 0 , K ˉ 0 , K − , η \pi^+, \pi^0, \pi^-, K^+, K^0, \bar{K}^0, K^-, \eta π + , π 0 , π − , K + , K 0 , K ˉ 0 , K − , η .Baryon octet: p , n , Σ + , Σ 0 , Σ − , Ξ 0 , Ξ − , Λ p, n, \Sigma^+, \Sigma^0, \Sigma^-, \Xi^0, \Xi^-, \Lambda p , n , Σ + , Σ 0 , Σ − , Ξ 0 , Ξ − , Λ .Baryon decuplet: Δ + + , Δ + , Δ 0 , Δ − , Σ ∗ , Ξ ∗ , Ω − \Delta^{++}, \Delta^+, \Delta^0, \Delta^-, \Sigma^*, \Xi^*, \Omega^- Δ ++ , Δ + , Δ 0 , Δ − , Σ ∗ , Ξ ∗ , Ω − .The prediction of the Ω − \Omega^- Ω − (with strangeness S = − 3 S = -3 S = − 3 ) by Gell-Mann in 1962 and its discovery In 1964 was a triumph of the quark model.
Example 5.3: Eightfold way mass formula for the baryon octet The Gell-Mann—Okubo mass formula for the baryon octet is:
1 2 ( N + Ξ ) + 3 2 Λ = 2 Σ \frac{1}{2}(N + \Xi) + \frac{3}{2}\Lambda = 2\Sigma 2 1 ( N + Ξ ) + 2 3 Λ = 2Σ
Where N N N , Ξ \Xi Ξ , Λ \Lambda Λ , Σ \Sigma Σ denote the average masses of the respective isospin Multiplets. Substituting the experimental values:
N = m p + m n 2 = 938.3 + 939.6 2 = 938.9 M e V N = \frac{m_p + m_n}{2} = \frac{938.3 + 939.6}{2} = 938.9\;\mathrm{MeV} N = 2 m p + m n = 2 938.3 + 939.6 = 938.9 MeV Ξ = m Ξ 0 + m Ξ − 2 = 1314.9 + 1321.7 2 = 1318.3 M e V \Xi = \frac{m_{\Xi^0} + m_{\Xi^-}}{2} = \frac{1314.9 + 1321.7}{2} = 1318.3\;\mathrm{MeV} Ξ = 2 m Ξ 0 + m Ξ − = 2 1314.9 + 1321.7 = 1318.3 MeV Λ = 1115.7 M e V \Lambda = 1115.7\;\mathrm{MeV} Λ = 1115.7 MeV Σ = m Σ + + m Σ 0 + m Σ − 3 = 1189.4 + 1192.6 + 1197.4 3 = 1193.1 M e V \Sigma = \frac{m_{\Sigma^+} + m_{\Sigma^0} + m_{\Sigma^-}}{3} = \frac{1189.4 + 1192.6 + 1197.4}{3} = 1193.1\;\mathrm{MeV} Σ = 3 m Σ + + m Σ 0 + m Σ − = 3 1189.4 + 1192.6 + 1197.4 = 1193.1 MeV
Left-hand side:
1 2 ( 938.9 + 1318.3 ) + 3 2 ( 1115.7 ) = 1128.6 + 1673.6 = 2802.2 M e V \frac{1}{2}(938.9 + 1318.3) + \frac{3}{2}(1115.7) = 1128.6 + 1673.6 = 2802.2\;\mathrm{MeV} 2 1 ( 938.9 + 1318.3 ) + 2 3 ( 1115.7 ) = 1128.6 + 1673.6 = 2802.2 MeV
Right-hand side:
2 × 1193.1 = 2386.2 M e V 2 \times 1193.1 = 2386.2\;\mathrm{MeV} 2 × 1193.1 = 2386.2 MeV
Wait --- these do not match. This is because the GMO formula for the octet is correctly:
m N + m Ξ 2 = 3 m Λ + m Σ 4 \frac{m_N + m_\Xi}{2} = \frac{3m_\Lambda + m_\Sigma}{4} 2 m N + m Ξ = 4 3 m Λ + m Σ
Left-hand side: ( 938.9 + 1318.3 ) / 2 = 1128.6 (938.9 + 1318.3)/2 = 1128.6 ( 938.9 + 1318.3 ) /2 = 1128.6 MeV. Right-hand side: ( 3 × 1115.7 + 1193.1 ) / 4 = ( 3347.1 + 1193.1 ) / 4 = 4540.2 / 4 = 1135.1 (3 \times 1115.7 + 1193.1)/4 = (3347.1 + 1193.1)/4 = 4540.2/4 = 1135.1 ( 3 × 1115.7 + 1193.1 ) /4 = ( 3347.1 + 1193.1 ) /4 = 4540.2/4 = 1135.1 MeV.
The agreement is within ∼ 0.6 % \sim 0.6\% ∼ 0.6% Confirming the SU(3) flavour symmetry to good Approximation. The small deviation is due to SU(3) breaking by the strange quark mass.
Example 5.4: Decuplet equal-spacing rule The baryon decuplet states have masses that follow an equal-spacing rule in strangeness:
m Ω − − m Ξ ∗ = m Ξ ∗ − m Σ ∗ = m Σ ∗ − m Δ m_{\Omega^-} - m_{\Xi^*} = m_{\Xi^*} - m_{\Sigma^*} = m_{\Sigma^*} - m_\Delta m Ω − − m Ξ ∗ = m Ξ ∗ − m Σ ∗ = m Σ ∗ − m Δ
Checking with experimental values:
m Δ ≈ 1232 m_\Delta \approx 1232 m Δ ≈ 1232 MeVm Σ ∗ ≈ 1385 m_{\Sigma^*} \approx 1385 m Σ ∗ ≈ 1385 MeVm Ξ ∗ ≈ 1533 m_{\Xi^*} \approx 1533 m Ξ ∗ ≈ 1533 MeVm Ω − ≈ 1672.5 m_{\Omega^-} \approx 1672.5 m Ω − ≈ 1672.5 MeVSpacing: Δ m 1 = 1385 − 1232 = 153 \Delta m_1 = 1385 - 1232 = 153 Δ m 1 = 1385 − 1232 = 153 MeV, Δ m 2 = 1533 − 1385 = 148 \Delta m_2 = 1533 - 1385 = 148 Δ m 2 = 1533 − 1385 = 148 MeV, Δ m 3 = 1672.5 − 1533 = 139.5 \Delta m_3 = 1672.5 - 1533 = 139.5 Δ m 3 = 1672.5 − 1533 = 139.5 MeV.
The spacings are approximately equal (to within ∼ 9 % \sim 9\% ∼ 9% ), consistent with the Gell-Mann—Okubo prediction for the decuplet. The deviations reflect higher-order SU(3)-breaking effects.
Example 5.5: Meson mass relations from the eightfold way For the pseudoscalar meson octet, the Gell-Mann—Okubo formula gives:
4 m K 2 = m π 2 + 3 m η 2 4m_K^2 = m_\pi^2 + 3m_\eta^2 4 m K 2 = m π 2 + 3 m η 2
Using experimental masses:
m π ≈ 140 m_\pi \approx 140 m π ≈ 140 MeV (average of π ± \pi^\pm π ± and π 0 \pi^0 π 0 )m K ≈ 496 m_K \approx 496 m K ≈ 496 MeV (average of K ± K^\pm K ± and K 0 K^0 K 0 )m η ≈ 548 m_\eta \approx 548 m η ≈ 548 MeVLeft-hand side: 4 × ( 496 ) 2 = 4 × 246 016 = 984 064 4 \times (496)^2 = 4 \times 246\,016 = 984\,064 4 × ( 496 ) 2 = 4 × 246 016 = 984 064 MeV2 ^2 2 .
Right-hand side: ( 140 ) 2 + 3 × ( 548 ) 2 = 19 600 + 3 × 300 304 = 19 600 + 900 912 = 920 512 (140)^2 + 3 \times (548)^2 = 19\,600 + 3 \times 300\,304 = 19\,600 + 900\,912 = 920\,512 ( 140 ) 2 + 3 × ( 548 ) 2 = 19 600 + 3 × 300 304 = 19 600 + 900 912 = 920 512 MeV2 ^2 2 .
The discrepancy is ( 984 064 − 920 512 ) / 920 512 ≈ 6.9 % (984\,064 - 920\,512)/920\,512 \approx 6.9\% ( 984 064 − 920 512 ) /920 512 ≈ 6.9% . This is larger than For the baryon octet, reflecting the fact that the pseudoscalar mesons are (approximately) Goldstone bosons of the spontaneously broken chiral symmetry, and their masses receive Additional contributions from the chiral anomaly (η ′ \eta' η ′ is not a pure octet state but mixes With the singlet). The η \eta η -η ′ \eta' η ′ mixing complicates the mass formula significantly.