Precision Tests of the Standard Model
13.1 The -2 Anomaly
The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron and muon:
The Dirac equation predicts exactly, but QED radiative corrections give:
The experimental value agrees with theory to 12 significant figures, making the most precisely verified prediction in all of physics.
The muon -2: The muon is times heavier than the electron, so it is more sensitive to virtual particles beyond the Standard Model (supersymmetry, dark photons, etc.).
This discrepancy (as of 2023) is one of the strongest hints of physics beyond the SM.
13.2 Electroweak Precision Observables
The -pole observables measured at LEP and SLC test the SM at the per-mil level:
- GeV
- GeV (total width)
- (effective weak mixing angle)
- (hadronic to leptonic width ratio)
- (forward-backward asymmetry)
The , , parameterisation (Peskin, Takeuchi) provides a model-independent framework for comparing these measurements:
Where is the radiative correction depending on , , . Current data give and Consistent with the SM () but leaving room for new physics.
13.3 Rare Decays and Flavour Physics
-physics anomalies. The LHCb experiment has observed several tensions in -meson decays:
: The ratio is predicted to be 1 in the SM (lepton universality). Measurements show ( deviation).
angular observables: The observable shows a persistent deviation from SM predictions.
These anomalies could indicate lepton-flavour-universal new physics (e.g., a boson coupling preferentially to muons).
Kaon physics: The extremely rare decay has been observed with BR (SM prediction), constraining new physics at the TeV scale through the process .
13.4 Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
The decay : violates lepton number by two units. If observed, it would prove that neutrinos are Majorana particles (identical to their antiparticles).
The half-life:
Where is the phase space factor, is the nuclear matrix element, and is the effective Majorana mass.
Current best limit: yr (Ge, GERDA), corresponding to — eV.
Worked Example 13.1: QED Correction to Electron $g$-Factor
The leading QED correction to :
The full QED + hadronic + weak correction:
Experimental (Gabrielse group, Harvard, 2023):
The agreement is at the level of out of I.e., relative precision of . This is the most precise test of any prediction in physics.
The comparison also determines to higher precision than any direct measurement:
Worked Examples
Example 1: Conservation laws
Problem. Is the decay possible? Check all conservation laws.
Solution. Charge: ✓. Baryon number: ✓. Lepton number: ✓. Strangeness: ✗ (violated, but strangeness is not conserved in weak decays). The decay is possible via the weak interaction.
Example 2: Hubble’s law
Problem. A galaxy has redshift . If , estimate its distance.
Solution. . .
Common Pitfalls
- Confusing Feynman diagrams with physical trajectories. Feynman diagrams are calculational tools, not pictures of particle paths. Fix: Each diagram represents a term in the perturbation series; internal lines are virtual particles.
- Wrong conservation law application. In particle reactions, conserve energy, momentum, charge, lepton number, baryon number, and strangeness (for strong interactions). Fix: Weak interactions can change strangeness; strong and EM interactions conserve it.
- Confusing redshift types. Cosmological redshift: due to expansion of space. Doppler redshift: due to relative motion. Fix: For distant galaxies, cosmological redshift dominates; for small .
Summary
- Standard Model: quarks, leptons, gauge bosons, Higgs boson; four fundamental forces.
- Conservation laws: energy, momentum, charge, baryon number, lepton number, strangeness (strong/EM only).
- Hubble’s law: ; evidence for the expanding universe.
- Big Bang: CMB radiation, nucleosynthesis, dark matter and dark energy.
Cross-References
| Topic | Site | Link |
|---|---|---|
| [Particle Physics] | A-Level | View |
| [Particle Physics] | University | View |