Skip to content

Precision Tests of the Standard Model

13.1 The gg-2 Anomaly

The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron and muon:

ae=ge22,aμ=gμ22a_e = \frac{g_e - 2}{2}, \quad a_\mu = \frac{g_\mu - 2}{2}

The Dirac equation predicts g=2g = 2 exactly, but QED radiative corrections give:

aeQED=α2π0.328478966(απ)2+1.181241456(απ)31.9144(35)(απ)4a_e^{\text{QED} = \frac{\alpha}{2\pi} - 0.328\,478\,966\left(\frac{\alpha}{\pi}\right)^2 + 1.181\,241\,456\left(\frac{\alpha}{\pi}\right)^3 - 1.9144(35)\left(\frac{\alpha}{\pi}\right)^4}

The experimental value agrees with theory to 12 significant figures, making aea_e the most precisely verified prediction in all of physics.

The muon gg-2: The muon is 207\sim 207 times heavier than the electron, so it is more sensitive to virtual particles beyond the Standard Model (supersymmetry, dark photons, etc.).

aμexpaμSM=(251±59)×1011a_\mu^{\text{exp} - a_\mu^{\text{SM} = (251 \pm 59) \times 10^{-11}}}

This 4.2σ\sim 4.2\sigma discrepancy (as of 2023) is one of the strongest hints of physics beyond the SM.

13.2 Electroweak Precision Observables

The ZZ-pole observables measured at LEP and SLC test the SM at the per-mil level:

  • mZ=91.1876±0.0021m_Z = 91.1876 \pm 0.0021 GeV
  • ΓZ=2.4952±0.0023\Gamma_Z = 2.4952 \pm 0.0023 GeV (total ZZ width)
  • sin2θefflept=0.23155±0.00016\sin^2\theta_{\text{eff}^{\text{lept} = 0.23155 \pm 0.00016}} (effective weak mixing angle)
  • R=Γhad/Γ=20.767±0.025R_\ell = \Gamma_{\text{had}/\Gamma_{\ell\ell} = 20.767 \pm 0.025} (hadronic to leptonic width ratio)
  • AFB0,=0.0171±0.0010A_{FB}^{0,\ell} = 0.0171 \pm 0.0010 (forward-backward asymmetry)

The SS, TT, UU parameterisation (Peskin, Takeuchi) provides a model-independent framework for comparing these measurements:

αem(mZ)=2GFmW2(1mW2/mZ2)πα×11Δr\alpha_{\text{em}(m_Z) = \frac{\sqrt{2}G_F m_W^2(1 - m_W^2/m_Z^2)}{\pi\alpha} \times \frac{1}{1 - \Delta r}}

Where Δr\Delta r is the radiative correction depending on SS, TT, UU. Current data give S=0.05±0.11S = 0.05 \pm 0.11 and T=0.09±0.13T = 0.09 \pm 0.13Consistent with the SM (S=T=0S = T = 0) but leaving room for new physics.

13.3 Rare Decays and Flavour Physics

BB-physics anomalies. The LHCb experiment has observed several tensions in BB-meson decays:

  • RK()R_{K^{(*)}}: The ratio RK=BR(B+K+μ+μ)/BR(B+K+e+e)R_K = \text{BR}(B^+ \to K^+\mu^+\mu^-)/\text{BR}(B^+ \to K^+e^+e^-) is predicted to be 1 in the SM (lepton universality). Measurements show RK=0.8460.041+0.044R_K = 0.846^{+0.044}_{-0.041} (3.1σ3.1\sigma deviation).

  • bs+b \to s\ell^+\ell^- angular observables: The observable P5"P_5" shows a persistent deviation from SM predictions.

These anomalies could indicate lepton-flavour-universal new physics (e.g., a ZZ' boson coupling preferentially to muons).

Kaon physics: The extremely rare decay KLμ+μK_L \to \mu^+\mu^- has been observed with BR 3×1011\sim 3 \times 10^{-11} (SM prediction), constraining new physics at the TeV scale through the process sd+s \to d\ell^+\ell^-.

13.4 Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay

The decay 0νββ0\nu\beta\beta: (A,Z)(A,Z+2)+2e(A, Z) \to (A, Z+2) + 2e^- violates lepton number by two units. If observed, it would prove that neutrinos are Majorana particles (identical to their antiparticles).

The half-life:

(T1/20ν)1=G0νM0ν2mββ2me2(T_{1/2}^{0\nu})^{-1} = G_{0\nu}|M_{0\nu}|^2\frac{\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle^2}{m_e^2}

Where G0νG_{0\nu} is the phase space factor, M0νM_{0\nu} is the nuclear matrix element, and mββ\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle is the effective Majorana mass.

Current best limit: T1/20ν>1.8×1026T_{1/2}^{0\nu} > 1.8 \times 10^{26} yr (76^{76}Ge, GERDA), corresponding to mββ<0.07\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle < 0.070.160.16 eV.

Worked Example 13.1: QED Correction to Electron $g$-Factor

The leading QED correction to aea_e:

ae(1)=α2π=1/137.0362π=0.001161×103a_e^{(1)} = \frac{\alpha}{2\pi} = \frac{1/137.036}{2\pi} = 0.001161 \times 10^{-3}

The full QED + hadronic + weak correction:

aetotal=1159652180.73(0.28)×1012a_e^{\text{total} = 1\,159\,652\,180.73(0.28) \times 10^{-12}}

Experimental (Gabrielse group, Harvard, 2023):

aeexp=1159652180.59(0.22)×1012a_e^{\text{exp} = 1\,159\,652\,180.59(0.22) \times 10^{-12}}

The agreement is at the level of 0.2×10120.2 \times 10^{-12} out of 1160×1091160 \times 10^{-9}I.e., relative precision of 1.7×10131.7 \times 10^{-13}. This is the most precise test of any prediction in physics.

The comparison also determines α\alpha to higher precision than any direct measurement:

α1=137.035999166(15)\alpha^{-1} = 137.035\,999\,166(15)

Worked Examples

Example 1: Conservation laws

Problem. Is the decay Λ0p+π\Lambda^0 \to p + \pi^- possible? Check all conservation laws.

Solution. Charge: 0=+1+(1)0 = +1 + (-1) ✓. Baryon number: 1=1+01 = 1 + 0 ✓. Lepton number: 0=0+00 = 0 + 0 ✓. Strangeness: 10+0-1 \neq 0 + 0 ✗ (violated, but strangeness is not conserved in weak decays). The decay is possible via the weak interaction.

\blacksquare

Example 2: Hubble’s law

Problem. A galaxy has redshift z=0.05z = 0.05. If H0=70km/s/MpcH_0 = 70 \mathrm{ km/s/Mpc}, estimate its distance.

Solution. vcz=0.05×3×105=1.5×104km/sv \approx cz = 0.05 \times 3 \times 10^5 = 1.5 \times 10^4 \mathrm{ km/s}. d=v/H0=15000/70=214Mpcd = v/H_0 = 15000/70 = 214 \mathrm{ Mpc}.

\blacksquare

Common Pitfalls

  • Confusing Feynman diagrams with physical trajectories. Feynman diagrams are calculational tools, not pictures of particle paths. Fix: Each diagram represents a term in the perturbation series; internal lines are virtual particles.
  • Wrong conservation law application. In particle reactions, conserve energy, momentum, charge, lepton number, baryon number, and strangeness (for strong interactions). Fix: Weak interactions can change strangeness; strong and EM interactions conserve it.
  • Confusing redshift types. Cosmological redshift: due to expansion of space. Doppler redshift: due to relative motion. Fix: For distant galaxies, cosmological redshift dominates; zH0d/cz \approx H_0 d/c for small zz.

Summary

  • Standard Model: quarks, leptons, gauge bosons, Higgs boson; four fundamental forces.
  • Conservation laws: energy, momentum, charge, baryon number, lepton number, strangeness (strong/EM only).
  • Hubble’s law: v=H0dv = H_0 d; evidence for the expanding universe.
  • Big Bang: CMB radiation, nucleosynthesis, dark matter and dark energy.

Cross-References

TopicSiteLink
[Particle Physics]A-LevelView
[Particle Physics]UniversityView