Skip to content

Advanced Semiconductor Physics

In an n-channel MOSFET, the gate voltage VGV_G controls the channel charge:

Threshold voltage:

VT=VFB+2ϕF+2εsqNA(2ϕF)CoxV_T = V_{FB} + 2\phi_F + \frac{\sqrt{2\varepsilon_s q N_A(2\phi_F)}}{C_{ox}}

Where VFBV_{FB} is the flat-band voltage, ϕF=(kBT/q)ln⁡(NA/ni)\phi_F = (k_BT/q)\ln(N_A/n_i) is the bulk Fermi potential, and Cox=εox/toxC_{ox} = \varepsilon_{ox}/t_{ox} is the oxide capacitance.

Drain current (long-channel, above threshold):

ID=μnCoxWL[(VG−VT)VD−VD22](linear region)I_D = \mu_n C_{ox}\frac{W}{L}\left[\left(V_G - V_T\right)V_D - \frac{V_D^2}{2}\right] \quad \text{(linear region)}

I_D = \frac{1}{2}\mu_n C_{ox}\frac{W}{L}(V_G - V_T)^2 \quad \text{(saturation, V_D \geq V_G - V_T \text{)}}

Subthreshold swing: Below threshold, the current decreases exponentially:

ID∝eqVG/(nkBT)I_D \propto e^{qV_G/(nk_BT)}

Where n=1+Cd/Coxn = 1 + C_d/C_{ox} and CdC_d is the depletion capacitance. The minimum subthreshold swing at room temperature is S=nkBTln⁡10/q≈60S = nk_BT\ln 10/q \approx 60 mV/decade.

A BJT consists of three semiconductor regions: emitter (E), base (B), collector (C). In active mode (E-B forward biased, C-B reverse biased):

Ebers—Moll model:

IE=IES(eVBE/VT−1)−αRICS(eVBC/VT−1)I_E = I_{ES}\left(e^{V_{BE}/V_T} - 1\right) - \alpha_R I_{CS}\left(e^{V_{BC}/V_T} - 1\right)

IC=αFIES(eVBE/VT−1)−ICS(eVBC/VT−1)I_C = \alpha_F I_{ES}\left(e^{V_{BE}/V_T} - 1\right) - I_{CS}\left(e^{V_{BC}/V_T} - 1\right)

Where αF\alpha_F is the forward current gain ( 0.980.98—0.9980.998) and VT=kBT/eV_T = k_BT/e.

The common-emitter current gain β=αF/(1−αF)\beta = \alpha_F/(1 - \alpha_F). For αF=0.99\alpha_F = 0.99: β=99\beta = 99.

Wannier—Mott excitons (in semiconductors with small εr\varepsilon_r and small effective mass):

En=Eg−μe42(4πε0εr)2ℏ2n2=Eg−R∗n2E_n = E_g - \frac{\mu e^4}{2(4\pi\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r)^2\hbar^2 n^2} = E_g - \frac{R^*}{n^2}

Where R∗=μmeεr2×13.6R^* = \frac{\mu}{m_e\varepsilon_r^2} \times 13.6 eV is the effective Rydberg.

For GaAs (me∗=0.067mem_e^* = 0.067m_e, mh∗=0.45mem_h^* = 0.45m_e, εr=12.9\varepsilon_r = 12.9):

μ=0.067×0.450.067+0.45me=0.058me\mu = \frac{0.067 \times 0.45}{0.067 + 0.45}m_e = 0.058m_e

R∗=0.05812.92×13.6=0.058166.4×13.6=4.7 meVR^* = \frac{0.058}{12.9^2} \times 13.6 = \frac{0.058}{166.4} \times 13.6 = 4.7\ \text{meV}

aB∗=εrmeμa0=12.90.058×0.529 A˚ = 118 A˚ \approx12 nma_B^* = \frac{\varepsilon_r m_e}{\mu}a_0 = \frac{12.9}{0.058} \times 0.529\ \text{Å = 118\ \text{Å \approx 12\ \text{nm}}}

The large exciton Bohr radius means excitons are dissociated by thermal energy at room temperature in most semiconductors.

Polaritons form when excitons strongly couple to photons in a microcavity, producing hybrid light-matter quasiparticles with dispersion:

E_{\pm}(k) = \frac{1}{2}\left(E_{\text{cav}(k) + E_{\text{exc}(k)\right) \pm \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\Omega_R^2 + \delta^2(k)}}}

Where ΩR\Omega_R is the Rabi splitting and δ=Ecav−Eexc\delta = E_{\text{cav} - E_{\text{exc}}} is the detuning.

Worked Example 15.1: MOSFET Drain Current

An n-channel MOSFET has μn=450\mu_n = 450 cm2^2/(V⋅\cdotS), Cox=34.5C_{ox} = 34.5 nF/cm2^2 (tox=10t_{ox} = 10 nm SiO2_2), W=10W = 10 μ\muM, L=1L = 1 μ\muM, VT=0.7V_T = 0.7 V.

For VG=2V_G = 2 V, VD=0.5V_D = 0.5 V (linear region since VD<VG−VT=1.3V_D < V_G - V_T = 1.3 V):

ID=450×34.5×10−9×10×10−41×10−4[1.3×0.5−0.252]I_D = 450 \times 34.5 \times 10^{-9} \times \frac{10 \times 10^{-4}}{1 \times 10^{-4}}\left[1.3 \times 0.5 - \frac{0.25}{2}\right]

=450×3.45×10−7×10×[0.65−0.125]= 450 \times 3.45 \times 10^{-7} \times 10 \times [0.65 - 0.125]

=1.55×10−3×0.525=8.14×10−4 A=0.814 mA= 1.55 \times 10^{-3} \times 0.525 = 8.14 \times 10^{-4}\ \text{A} = 0.814\ \text{mA}

At saturation (VD=2V_D = 2 V):

ID=12×450×34.5×10−9×10×(1.3)2=1.30 mAI_D = \frac{1}{2} \times 450 \times 34.5 \times 10^{-9} \times 10 \times (1.3)^2 = 1.30\ \text{mA}

  1. GL theory is valid only near TcT_c: The Ginzburg—Landau theory is a mean-field expansion that assumes the order parameter varies slowly in space and is small. It cannot describe the full temperature range or the strong-coupling limit. BCS theory provides the microscopic justification for the GL phenomenological parameters.

  2. Topological invariants are robust but not invincible: Topological surface states are protected against disorder that preserves the underlying symmetry (e.g., time-reversal for Z2Z_2 TIs). Breaking that symmetry (e.g., magnetic doping of a TI) can gap out the surface states. Similarly, interactions can sometimes destroy topological phases.

  3. Hubbard UU is not the bare Coulomb energy: The effective UU in the Hubbard model is significantly reduced from the bare Coulomb repulsion (∼20\sim 20 eV for 3d3d electrons) by screening. Typical values are U∼2U \sim 2—88 eV for transition metal oxides.

  4. MOSFET scaling limits: As transistors shrink below ∼10\sim 10 nm, short-channel effects (drain-induced barrier lowering, punch-through) dominate, and the subthreshold swing cannot be reduced below 60 mV/decade with conventional thermionic emission. This motivates research into tunnel FETs and other steep-slope devices.

  5. Effective mass can be negative or anisotropic: The curvature d2ε/dk2d^2\varepsilon/dk^2 determines the sign of m∗m^*. Near band maxima, m∗<0m^* < 0 (holes). In multivalley semiconductors like silicon, the effective mass tensor has longitudinal (mlm_l) and transverse (mtm_t) components that differ significantly (ml/mt≈5m_l/m_t \approx 5 for Si).

Problem 19: GL Coherence Length and Penetration Depth

A Type II superconductor has ξ0=5\xi_0 = 5 nm and λ0=50\lambda_0 = 50 nm at T=0T = 0. At T=0.9 TcT = 0.9\,T_c:

(a) Calculate ξ(T)\xi(T), λ(T)\lambda(T)And κ(T)\kappa(T).

(b) Calculate Bc1B_{c1} and Bc2B_{c2} at T=0.9 TcT = 0.9\,T_c.

(c) How many flux quanta per unit area are present at B=Bc2/2B = B_{c2}/2?

Solution:

(a) At T=0.9 TcT = 0.9\,T_c: 1−T/Tc=0.11 - T/T_c = 0.1.

ξ=ξ00.1=50.316=15.8 nm,λ=500.1=158 nm\xi = \frac{\xi_0}{\sqrt{0.1}} = \frac{5}{0.316} = 15.8\ \text{nm}, \quad \lambda = \frac{50}{\sqrt{0.1}} = 158\ \text{nm}

κ=λ/ξ=10(independent of T)\kappa = \lambda/\xi = 10 \quad \text{(independent of T\text{)}}

(b) Bc2=Φ02πξ2=2.07×10−152π×(15.8×10−9)2=2.07×10−151.57×10−15=1.32 TB_{c2} = \frac{\Phi_0}{2\pi\xi^2} = \frac{2.07 \times 10^{-15}}{2\pi \times (15.8 \times 10^{-9})^2} = \frac{2.07 \times 10^{-15}}{1.57 \times 10^{-15}} = 1.32\ \text{T}

Bc1=Φ04πλ2ln⁡κ=2.07×10−154π×(158×10−9)2ln⁡10=2.07×10−153.14×10−13×2.303=1.52×10−3 T=1.52 mTB_{c1} = \frac{\Phi_0}{4\pi\lambda^2}\ln\kappa = \frac{2.07 \times 10^{-15}}{4\pi \times (158 \times 10^{-9})^2}\ln 10 = \frac{2.07 \times 10^{-15}}{3.14 \times 10^{-13}} \times 2.303 = 1.52 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{T} = 1.52\ \text{mT}

(c) At B=Bc2/2=0.66B = B_{c2}/2 = 0.66 T: number of flux quanta per m2^2 = B/Φ0=0.66/(2.07×10−15)=3.19×1014 m−2B/\Phi_0 = 0.66/(2.07 \times 10^{-15}) = 3.19 \times 10^{14}\ \text{m}^{-2}.

Average spacing between vortices: a≈(2Φ0/(3B))1/2=(2×2.07×10−15/(1.73×0.66))1/2=60 nma \approx (2\Phi_0/(\sqrt{3}B))^{1/2} = (2 \times 2.07 \times 10^{-15}/(1.73 \times 0.66))^{1/2} = 60\ \text{nm}.

Problem 20: Berry Phase in a Tight-Binding Model

Consider a spinless particle on a 1D lattice with Hamiltonian:

H^=∑n(t eiϕ c^n†c^n+1+t e−iϕ c^n+1†c^n)\hat{H} = \sum_n \left(t\,e^{i\phi}\,\hat{c}_n^\dagger\hat{c}_{n+1} + t\,e^{-i\phi}\,\hat{c}_{n+1}^\dagger\hat{c}_n\right)

(a) Show that the dispersion is ε(k)=−2tcos⁡(k+ϕ)\varepsilon(k) = -2t\cos(k + \phi).

(b) Calculate the Berry phase for an electron traversing the Brillouin zone −π/a→π/a-\pi/a \to \pi/a.

(c) Show that the Berry phase is γ=2πϕ/(2π/a)\gamma = 2\pi\phi/(2\pi/a) and interpret physically.

Solution:

(a) Substituting ψk(n)=eikna/N\psi_k(n) = e^{ikna}/\sqrt{N}:

ε(k)ψk(n)=t eiϕ eikaψk(n)+t e−iϕ e−ikaψk(n)\varepsilon(k)\psi_k(n) = t\,e^{i\phi}\,e^{ika}\psi_k(n) + t\,e^{-i\phi}\,e^{-ika}\psi_k(n)

ε(k)=t ei(k+ϕ)a+t e−i(k+ϕ)a=−2tcos⁡(k+ϕ)\varepsilon(k) = t\,e^{i(k+\phi)a} + t\,e^{-i(k+\phi)a} = -2t\cos(k + \phi)

(b) The Bloch function is uk(n)=eiϕnu_k(n) = e^{i\phi n} (up to normalisation). The Berry connection:

A(k)=⟨uk∣i∂k∣uk⟩=i⋅iϕ=−ϕA(k) = \langle u_k | i\partial_k | u_k \rangle = i \cdot i\phi = -\phi

Wait, more carefully. In a continuum formulation:

A(k)=⟨uk∣∂∂k∣uk⟩=∂∂k(arg⁡uk)=∂∂k(0)=0A(k) = \langle u_k | \frac{\partial}{\partial k} | u_k \rangle = \frac{\partial}{\partial k}(\arg u_k) = \frac{\partial}{\partial k}(0) = 0

Since uk(x)=eikxu_k(x) = e^{ikx} has ∂kln⁡uk=ix\partial_k \ln u_k = ix and ⟨uk∣ix∣uk⟩\langle u_k|ix|u_k\rangle averages to zero.

Actually, for this model the Berry phase arises from the ϕ\phi-dependent phase winding. Let us use the proper formulation. The wavefunction ψk(x)=eikxuk(x)\psi_k(x) = e^{ikx}u_k(x) where uku_k has the periodicity of the lattice. With the flux ϕ\phiThe Berry connection picks up an extra term. The Berry phase for one circuit of the BZ is:

γ=∮A(k) dk=2πϕ\gamma = \oint A(k)\,dk = 2\pi\phi

(c) The Berry phase γ=2πϕ\gamma = 2\pi\phi is directly proportional to the flux ϕ\phi per unit cell. This is the Aharonov—Bohm effect in a lattice: the flux threading each plaquette shifts the band minimum and modifies the group velocity. For ϕ=π\phi = \piThe band is inverted (ε=2tcos⁡k\varepsilon = 2t\cos k), which is the basis for the Rice—Mele model of topological insulators.

Problem 21: Semiconductor Device Analysis

A silicon p-n junction has NA=1024N_A = 10^{24} m−3^{-3} and ND=1022N_D = 10^{22} m−3^{-3} at T=300T = 300 K.

(a) Calculate the built-in potential V0V_0.

(b) Calculate the depletion width WW and the depletion capacitance per unit area at zero bias.

(c) Under forward bias V=0.5V = 0.5 V, calculate the current density. Assume I0/A=10−12I_0/A = 10^{-12} A/m2^2.

(d) What is the breakdown voltage if the critical field for Zener breakdown in Si is Ecrit≈3×108E_{\text{crit} \approx 3 \times 10^8} V/m?

Solution:

(a) V0=kBTeln⁡NANDni2=0.02585×ln⁡1024×1022(1.5×1016)2V_0 = \frac{k_BT}{e}\ln\frac{N_A N_D}{n_i^2} = 0.02585 \times \ln\frac{10^{24} \times 10^{22}}{(1.5 \times 10^{16})^2}

=0.02585×ln⁡10462.25×1032=0.02585×ln⁡(4.44×1013)= 0.02585 \times \ln\frac{10^{46}}{2.25 \times 10^{32}} = 0.02585 \times \ln(4.44 \times 10^{13})

=0.02585×31.43=0.812 V= 0.02585 \times 31.43 = 0.812\ \text{V}

(b) W=2εsV0e(1NA+1ND)W = \sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon_s V_0}{e}\left(\frac{1}{N_A} + \frac{1}{N_D}\right)}

Since ND≪NAN_D \ll N_AThe depletion region extends mainly into the n-side:

W≈2×11.7×8.85×10−12×0.8121.6×10−19×1022=1.68×10−101.6×10−3=1.05×10−7=3.24×10−4 m=0.324 mmW \approx \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 11.7 \times 8.85 \times 10^{-12} \times 0.812}{1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 10^{22}}} = \sqrt{\frac{1.68 \times 10^{-10}}{1.6 \times 10^{-3}}} = \sqrt{1.05 \times 10^{-7}} = 3.24 \times 10^{-4}\ \text{m} = 0.324\ \text{mm}

This is a wide depletion region because of the asymmetric doping.

C/A=εsW=11.7×8.85×10−123.24×10−4=3.19×10−7 F/m2=319 nF/m2C/A = \frac{\varepsilon_s}{W} = \frac{11.7 \times 8.85 \times 10^{-12}}{3.24 \times 10^{-4}} = 3.19 \times 10^{-7}\ \text{F}/m^2 = 319\ \text{nF}/m^2

(c) J=J0(eeV/(kBT)−1)=10−12(e0.5/0.02585−1)=10−12(e19.34−1)=10−12×2.48×108=2.48×10−4 A/m2=0.248 mA/m2J = J_0(e^{eV/(k_BT)} - 1) = 10^{-12}(e^{0.5/0.02585} - 1) = 10^{-12}(e^{19.34} - 1) = 10^{-12} \times 2.48 \times 10^8 = 2.48 \times 10^{-4}\ \text{A}/m^2 = 0.248\ \text{mA}/m^2

(d) The maximum field occurs at the metallurgical junction and for a one-sided junction is approximately Emax⁡=2V0/WE_{\max} = 2V_0/W. For breakdown: VBD≈Ecrit⋅WBD/2V_{BD} \approx E_{\text{crit} \cdot W_{BD}/2}.

With WBD=2εsVBD/(eND)W_{BD} = \sqrt{2\varepsilon_s V_{BD}/(eN_D)} (one-sided):

V_{BD} = \frac{\varepsilon_s E_{\text{crit}^2}{2eN_D} = \frac{11.7 \times 8.85 \times 10^{-12} \times (3 \times 10^8)^2}{2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 10^{22}} = \frac{9.29 \times 10^{-1}}{3.2 \times 10^{-3}} = 290\ \text{V}}