Skip to content

Many-Body Physics in Solids

14.1 Electron—Electron Interactions: Screening

In a metal, the Coulomb interaction between electrons is screened by the other electrons. The Thomas—Fermi screening wavevector:

qTF2=e2g(εF)ε0=4kFπa0q_{\text{TF}^2 = \frac{e^2 g(\varepsilon_F)}{\varepsilon_0} = \frac{4k_F}{\pi a_0}}

Where a0=4πε02/(mee2)a_0 = 4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2/(m_e e^2) is the Bohr radius. The screened potential:

Vscr(r)=e24πε0reqTFrV_{\text{scr}(r) = \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\,e^{-q_{\text{TF} r}}}

The screening length λTF=1/qTF0.5\lambda_{\text{TF} = 1/q_{\text{TF} \sim 0.5}} Å in metals (about one atomic spacing), meaning the Coulomb interaction is very short-ranged.

14.2 The Hubbard Model

The Hubbard model captures the competition between kinetic energy (delocalisation) and on-site Coulomb repulsion (localisation):

H^=ti,j,σc^iσc^jσ+Uin^in^i\hat{H} = -t\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle,\sigma}\hat{c}_{i\sigma}^\dagger\hat{c}_{j\sigma} + U\sum_i \hat{n}_{i\uparrow}\hat{n}_{i\downarrow}

Where tt is the hopping integral and UU is the on-site repulsion energy.

Limiting cases:

  • UtU \ll t: Weakly correlated metal (well-described by band theory)
  • UtU \gg t: Mott insulator (each site has exactly one electron, localised by strong repulsion)
  • U/t1U/t \sim 1: Strongly correlated regime (intermediate coupling), relevant for transition metal oxides

The half-filled Hubbard model on a bipartite lattice has a metal—insulator transition at UcWU_c \sim W (bandwidth). For U>UcU > U_cThe system is a Mott insulator even though band theory predicts a metal.

14.3 Quasiparticles and Fermi Liquid Theory

Landau”s Fermi liquid theory (1956) states that the low-energy excitations of an interacting Fermi system can be described as quasiparticles --- weakly interacting fermions with renormalised parameters:

  • Effective mass mm^* (renormalised by interactions)
  • Residual quasiparticle—quasiparticle interactions described by Landau parameters FlF_l

The quasiparticle lifetime goes as τ1/(εεF)2\tau \propto 1/(\varepsilon - \varepsilon_F)^2So quasiparticles near the Fermi surface are well-defined (long-lived).

Experimental signatures of Fermi liquid behaviour:

  • CV=γTC_V = \gamma T with enhanced γm\gamma \propto m^*
  • ρ=ρ0+AT2\rho = \rho_0 + AT^2 (quadratic temperature dependence)
  • Pauli-like susceptibility χ\chi (temperature-independent)

Non-Fermi liquid behaviour occurs in many correlated systems (cuprates near optimal doping, heavy fermion materials near quantum critical points) where ρT\rho \propto T (linear) or other anomalous power laws are observed.

14.4 Kondo Effect

When a magnetic impurity (e.g., a single Fe atom) is embedded in a non-magnetic metal, the impurity spin is screened by conduction electrons at low temperature, forming a singlet state. This is the Kondo effect.

The Kondo temperature TKT_K sets the energy scale:

kBTKDe1/(N(EF)J)k_B T_K \sim D\,e^{-1/(N(E_F)J)}

Where DD is the bandwidth and JJ is the exchange coupling. Below TKT_K:

  • The resistivity increases logarithmically: Δρln(TK/T)\Delta\rho \propto \ln(T_K/T)
  • The impurity moment is fully screened
  • A narrow resonance (Kondo resonance) appears at the Fermi level in the density of states
Worked Example 14.1: Mott Transition

Consider the Hubbard model at half-filling on a Bethe lattice (infinite coordination number) with bandwidth W=12tW = 12t.

The Mott transition occurs when UWU \sim W. For typical transition metal oxides:

  • VO2_2: U1U \sim 122 eV, W2W \sim 2 eV --- near the transition (VO2_2 undergoes a metal—insulator transition at Tc=340T_c = 340 K)
  • NiO: U5U \sim 588 eV, W2W \sim 2 eV --- deep in the insulating regime
  • SrVO3_3: U1U \sim 133 eV, W3W \sim 3 eV --- correlated metal

In the Mott insulator NiO, band theory predicts a partially filled 3d3d band (metal), but strong correlations open a gap of 4\sim 4 eV between the lower and upper Hubbard bands. This is why DFT (which underestimates correlations) incorrectly predicts NiO to be metallic, while DFT+UU or GW methods correctly give an insulator.

Worked Example 14.2: Effective Mass Enhancement

In a heavy fermion material like CeCu2_2Si2_2The electronic specific heat coefficient is γ1\gamma \approx 1 J/(mol\cdotK2^2), compared with the free electron value γ01\gamma_0 \approx 1 mJ/(mol\cdotK2^2).

The mass enhancement:

mme=γγ010001=1000\frac{m^*}{m_e} = \frac{\gamma}{\gamma_0} \approx \frac{1000}{1} = 1000

This enormous enhancement arises from the Kondo effect: the 4f4f electrons of Ce hybridise with conduction electrons, forming heavy quasiparticles. The Kondo temperature TK10T_K \sim 10 K is the characteristic energy scale.

Similarly, the Pauli susceptibility is enhanced: χ/χ0=m/me=1000\chi/\chi_0 = m^*/m_e = 1000.