Advanced Topics in Superconductivity
12.1 Ginzburg—Landau Theory
Section titled “12.1 Ginzburg—Landau Theory”The Ginzburg—Landau (GL) theory provides a phenomenological description of superconductivity near using a complex order parameter where is the superfluid density.
The GL free energy functional:
Where (negative below ), , , (Cooper pair charge), and is the vector potential.
Minimising with respect to gives the first GL equation:
Minimising with respect to gives the second GL equation (supercurrent):
12.2 Coherence Length and Penetration Depth
Section titled “12.2 Coherence Length and Penetration Depth”Two fundamental length scales emerge from the GL theory:
Coherence length (characterises the spatial variation of ):
Penetration depth (characterises the decay of ):
Where is the bulk equilibrium value.
The ratio of these length scales determines the superconductor type:
- : Type I (positive surface energy)
- : Type II (negative surface energy, mixed state favourable)
12.3 Abrikosov Vortices
Section titled “12.3 Abrikosov Vortices”In the mixed state of a Type II superconductor (), magnetic flux penetrates in quantised vortices, each carrying one flux quantum:
The vortex core (radius ) is in the normal state, while supercurrents circulate around it (decaying over ).
The upper critical field from GL theory:
The lower critical field:
The thermodynamic critical field:
These satisfy for .
12.4 Flux Quantisation and Josephson Effect
Section titled “12.4 Flux Quantisation and Josephson Effect”Flux quantisation. The GL order parameter must be single-valued. Integrating the supercurrent around a closed loop enclosing flux :
Where is the phase of and is an integer. Hence .
DC Josephson effect. For a superconductor—insulator—superconductor (SIS) junction with phase difference :
Where is the critical current.
AC Josephson effect. Applying a voltage across the junction causes the phase to evolve as . Giving:
The oscillation frequency provides the basis for the Josephson voltage standard: .
12.5 Common Pitfalls
Section titled “12.5 Common Pitfalls”- Confusing and . The coherence length governs how fast the order parameter varies in space; the penetration depth governs how fast the magnetic field decays. They are independent length scales that happen to appear in the same theory.
- Type I vs Type II threshold. The criterion is exact within GL theory. Do not confuse this with or other round numbers. The factor arises from comparing the surface energies of normal-superconducting boundaries.
- Flux quantum uses , not . Each vortex carries because the superconducting condensate consists of Cooper pairs with charge . A common error is to use (the normal-state flux quantum for single electrons).
- GL theory is valid only near . The phenomenological expansion in assumes is small, which holds when is close to . Far below , microscopic BCS theory is required.
- AC Josephson frequency is exact. The relation does not depend on junction geometry or material properties. It is a fundamental quantum relation used to define the volt.
12.6 Connection to BCS Theory
Section titled “12.6 Connection to BCS Theory”The GL theory is phenomenological — it does not explain why superconductivity occurs. The microscopic BCS theory (Bardeen, Cooper, Schrieffer, 1957) provides this explanation:
- Cooper pairs. An attractive interaction mediated by phonons (lattice vibrations) allows electrons with opposite momenta and spins to form bound pairs. The binding energy is the superconducting gap , which vanishes at .
- Gap equation. At , the gap relates to via (weak-coupling limit). This ratio is approximately universal for conventional superconductors.
- Coherence length from BCS. The BCS coherence length where is the Fermi velocity. Typical values: — nm for conventional superconductors.
- Penetration depth from BCS. where is the superfluid density (all conduction electrons below ).
The GL parameters and can be expressed in terms of BCS quantities near : and , where is the density of states at the Fermi level. This connection shows that GL theory is the correct Ginzburg—Landau limit of BCS theory when .
Worked Example 12.1: Type I vs Type II Classification
Niobium has nm and nm, giving . Therefore Nb is Type II.
The experimental T. The discrepancy arises because the GL expressions use and at , while the actual values differ at .
For aluminium: nm, nm, . Al is strongly Type I.
Worked Example 12.2: Josephson Junction Frequency
A voltage V is applied across a Josephson junction:
The convenient relation is . This precise frequency-voltage relation is used to maintain the volt standard worldwide.
12.6 Applications
Section titled “12.6 Applications”| Application | Principle | Key Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| MRI magnets | Persistent supercurrents in Type II Nb-Ti coils | — T; nm |
| SQUID magnetometers | Flux quantisation in a superconducting loop with Josephson junctions | Sensitivity T |
| Josephson voltage standard | AC Josephson effect: | Accuracy |
| Particle accelerator dipoles | Type II NbSn for high-field confinement | — T |
| Quantum computing (transmons) | Josephson junction as non-linear inductor | — |
The GL theory underpins the design of all these devices. For MRI and accelerator magnets, the critical current density (determined by vortex pinning) is the key engineering parameter.
12.7 Key Relationships Summary
Section titled “12.7 Key Relationships Summary”| Quantity | Expression | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Coherence length | Diverges at | |
| Penetration depth | Diverges at | |
| GL parameter | : Type I; : Type II | |
| Flux quantum | Wb | Cooper pair charge |
| Upper critical field | GL result | |
| Lower critical field | GL result | |
| DC Josephson | Phase-dependent supercurrent | |
| AC Josephson | Frequency-voltage relation |