For a Hamiltonian H^=H^0+λH^" where H^′ is “small” and H^0 Has known eigenstates ∣n(0)⟩ and eigenvalues En(0).
First-order energy correction:
En(1)=⟨n(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩
Second-order energy correction:
En(2)=∑m=nEn(0)−Em(0)∣⟨m(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩∣2
First-order state correction:
∣n(1)⟩=∑m=nEn(0)−Em(0)⟨m(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩∣m(0)⟩
Physical interpretation. The first-order energy correction is the expectation value of the Perturbation in the unperturbed state. The second-order correction accounts for virtual transitions To other states: if the perturbation mixes in state ∣m⟩ with amplitude proportional to Vmn/(En−Em)The energy shift is the sum of ∣Vmn∣2/(En−Em) over all Intermediate states. Lower-energy intermediate states (Em<En) always lower the energy, While higher-energy ones raise it.
Higher-order corrections. The perturbation series can be extended to arbitrary order:
En=En(0)+λEn(1)+λ2En(2)+λ3En(3)+⋯
∣n⟩=∣n(0)⟩+λ∣n(1)⟩+λ2∣n(2)⟩+⋯
The series converges if λ∣⟨m∣H^′∣n⟩∣≪∣En(0)−Em(0)∣ for all m=n. In practice, low-order corrections often give excellent results for weak perturbations.
8.2 Degenerate Perturbation Theory
When En(0) is degenerate, the corrections are found by diagonalising the perturbation matrix in The degenerate subspace.
Theorem 8.1. The correct zeroth-order states are the eigenvectors of the matrix Wij=⟨ni(0)∣H^′∣nj(0)⟩ within the degenerate subspace.
Proof. In a d-dimensional degenerate subspace spanned by ∣n1(0)⟩,…,∣nd(0)⟩ The first-order correction to the states is undetermined by the non-degenerate formula (denominators Vanish). The correct approach is to note that H^ restricted to this subspace is:
H^sub=En(0)I^+λW^
Where Wij=⟨ni(0)∣H^′∣nj(0)⟩. Diagonalising W^ gives the correct Zeroth-order states and first-order energy splittings. ■
8.3 Worked Example: Perturbed Infinite Square Well
Problem. A one-dimensional infinite square well of width L has a small perturbation H′=V0 for 0<x<L/2 and H′=0 for L/2<x<L. Find the first-order energy Corrections.
Solution
The unperturbed states are ϕn(0)(x)=2/Lsin(nπx/L).
The first-order correction is En(1)=V0/2 for all n. ■
:::caution Common Pitfall Perturbation theory assumes the perturbation is “small” compared to the level spacing. If ∣⟨m∣H′∣n⟩∣∼∣En(0)−Em(0)∣The perturbation series may diverge. The Method also fails for systems where the unperturbed Hamiltonian has closely spaced or degenerate Levels that are not handled correctly.
8.4 Variational Principle
Theorem 8.2 (Variational Principle). For any normalised trial state ∣ϕ⟩:
⟨ϕ∣H^∣ϕ⟩≥E0
Where E0 is the true ground state energy. The equality holds if and only if ∣ϕ⟩=∣0⟩.
Proof. Expand the trial state in the energy eigenbasis:
∣ϕ⟩=∑n=0∞cn∣n⟩,∑n∣cn∣2=1
Then:
⟨ϕ∣H^∣ϕ⟩=∑n∣cn∣2En≥E0∑n∣cn∣2=E0
Since En≥E0 for all nAnd the inequality is strict unless cn=0 for all n≥1. ■
Procedure. Choose a trial wave function ϕ(x;α1,α2,…) depending on variational Parameters αi. Compute E(αi)=⟨ϕ∣H^∣ϕ⟩/⟨ϕ∣ϕ⟩ And minimise with respect to αi. The minimum provides an upper bound on E0.
Example 8.1. Use a Gaussian trial function ϕ(x)=Aexp(−x2/(2α2)) to estimate the Ground state energy of the anharmonic oscillator V(x)=21mω2x2+λx4.
Solution
The normalised Gaussian is ϕ(x)=(πα2)−1/4exp(−x2/(2α2)) with ⟨x2⟩=α2/2 and ⟨x4⟩=3α4/4.
For λ=0 (harmonic oscillator), this gives α2=ℏ/(mω) and E=ℏω/2Which is exact. For small λExpand α2=ℏ/(mω)(1−δ):
α2≈mωℏ(1−2m2ω33λℏ)
Evar≈2ℏω(1+4m2ω33λℏ)
This agrees with second-order perturbation theory to first order in λ.
8.5 WKB Approximation
The WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) method provides approximate solutions to the one-dimensional Schrodinger equation when the potential varies slowly compared to the de Broglie wavelength.
Ansatz. Write ψ(x)=A(x)exp(iS(x)/ℏ) and substitute into the Schrodinger equation:
−iℏA′S−ℏ2AS′′+ℏ2AS′2−AS′⋅ℏ2=(terms)
Actually, substituting directly into −ℏ2ψ′′/(2m)+Vψ=Eψ and separating orders of ℏ:
Leading order (ℏ0):S′(x)=±p(x)=±2m(E−V(x))
Next order (ℏ1):A′(x)/A(x)=−S′′(x)/(2S′(x))Giving A(x)∝1/p(x).
Therefore, in the classically allowed region (E>V):
ψ(x)≈p(x)Ccos(ℏ1∫x1xp(x′)dx′+4π)
Where x1 is a turning point (E=V(x1)).
Connection formulas. At a turning point, the WKB solutions must be matched. The standard Connection formula (for a linear turning point, V(x)≈E+V′(x1)(x−x1)) gives:
Approaching from the classically allowed side: p(x)2Ccos(ℏ1∫x1xp(x′)dx′−4π)⟷∣p(x)∣Cexp(−ℏ1∫xx1∣p(x′)∣dx′)
Quantization condition. For a potential well with turning points x1 and x2Applying the Connection formulas at both ends yields:
∫x1x2p(x)dx=(n+21)πℏ,n=0,1,2,…
Equivalently, using the closed phase-space integral:
∮pdx=(n+21)h
This is the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization condition, corrected by the 1/2 term from the connection Formulas.
Validity. The WKB approximation requires ∣dλ/dx∣≪1Where λ=h/p(x) is the Local de Broglie wavelength. Equivalently, the change in potential over one wavelength must be small Compared to the kinetic energy: ∣ℏ∣V′(x)∣/(2mp(x))∣≪1.
Example 8.2. Apply the WKB quantization condition to the harmonic oscillator.
Solution
For V(x)=21mω2x2The turning points are at x1,2=±2E/(mω2).
∫x1x22m(E−21mω2x2)dx=2mE∫−aa1−(x/a)2dx
Where a=2E/(mω2). The integral equals πa/2 times 2mE:
=2mE⋅2πa=ωπE
Setting this equal to (n+1/2)πℏ:
ωπE=(n+21)πℏ⟹En=(n+21)ℏω
This is the exact result! The WKB approximation gives the exact energy levels for the harmonic Oscillator because the potential is quadratic, so the connection formulas are exact.
Validity and limitations. The WKB method fails near turning points (where E=V(x)) because p(x)→0 and the local wavelength diverges. The linear approximation of the potential near Turning points (used to derive the connection formulas) breaks down when the potential is not smooth. The method also fails for potentials with discontinuities or cusps.
Despite these limitations, WKB is remarkably useful for estimating energy levels in potentials Where exact solutions are not available, and it forms the basis of the JWKB approximation in Scattering theory.