The ground state (n=1) has the lowest energy E1>0 (zero-point energy).
Energy levels are not equally spaced; En∝n2.
There are (n−1) nodes in the n-th eigenstate.
:::caution Common Pitfall The ground state has n=1Not n=0. The solution n=0 gives ϕ(x)=0 everywhere, Which is not normalisable. Furthermore, E1>0 (zero-point energy) is a direct consequence of The uncertainty principle: confining the particle to a finite region requires kinetic energy. :::
5.2 The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
V(x)=21mω2x2.
5.2.1 Algebraic Method: Ladder Operators
Define the ladder operators (creation and annihilation operators):
The energy spectrum is continuous (all E≥0). The eigenfunctions are not normalisable (plane Waves); physical states are wave packets constructed by superposition.
5.3.1 Parity
The parity operatorΠ^ reflects the coordinate: Π^ψ(x)=ψ(−x).
Properties:
Π^2=I^So eigenvalues are ±1.
Even functions (ψ(−x)=ψ(x)) have parity +1.
Odd functions (ψ(−x)=−ψ(x)) have parity −1.
If V(x)=V(−x) (symmetric potential), then [H^,Π^]=0So energy eigenstates can be chosen to have definite parity.
Theorem 5.1. For a symmetric potential V(x)=V(−x)The energy eigenstates are either even Or odd.
Proof. Since [H^,Π^]=0There exists a simultaneous eigenbasis. Let H^ϕ=Eϕ and Π^ϕ=πϕ where π=±1. Then ϕ(−x)=πϕ(x) So ϕ is either even (π=+1) or odd (π=−1). ■
This theorem explains why the infinite square well, harmonic oscillator, and finite square well Eigenstates all have definite parity: their potentials are all symmetric about the origin.
5.3.2 The Virial Theorem
Theorem 5.2 (Virial Theorem). For a stationary state of a Hamiltonian H^=p^2/(2m)+V(x^):
2⟨T⟩=⟨xV"(x)⟩
Where T is the kinetic energy.
Proof. Using Ehrenfest’s theorem for the operator G^=x^p^:
These are transcendental equations solved graphically. Define z=ka and z0=a2mV0/ℏ2.
The even condition becomes tanz=z02/z2−1 and the odd condition becomes −cotz=z02/z2−1. The number of bound states is N=⌊2z0/π⌋+1. There is always at least one bound state (the even ground state).
5.4.2 Scattering States (E>0)
For E>0The particle has enough energy to escape. Define k1=2mE/ℏ (outside) And k2=2m(E+V0)/ℏ (inside). The solutions are oscillatory everywhere. The Transmission coefficient is:
T=1+4E(E+V0)V02sin2(2k2a)1
Resonances occur when 2k2a=nπ (integer multiples of π), giving T=1: the well Becomes perfectly transparent.
Example 5.3. A finite square well has V0=5eV and 2a=1nm. Estimate the Number of bound states for an electron.
The number of bound states is N=⌊2z0/π⌋+1=⌊36.22/π⌋+1=⌊11.53⌋+1=12.
(Actually, the formula is N=⌊z0/(π/2)⌋+1 only when counting the number of Intersections. With z0/(π/2)=18.11/1.571=11.53There are 11 full intersections plus one Partial, giving about 11 or 12 bound states.)
5.5 The Delta Function Potential
Consider V(x)=−αδ(x) where α>0.
5.5.1 Bound State (E<0)
The wave function is ψ(x)=Aeκx for x<0 and ψ(x)=Be−κx for x>0 Where κ=−2mE/ℏ.
Matching conditions.
Continuity:A=B at x=0.
Discontinuity in derivative (integrating the Schrodinger equation across x=0):
ψ′(0+)−ψ′(0−)=−ℏ22mαψ(0)
This gives −κB−κA=−2mαA/ℏ2And since A=B:
κ=ℏ2mα
The bound state energy is:
E=−2mℏ2κ2=−2ℏ2mα2
The normalised wave function is ψ(x)=κe−κ∣x∣. There is exactly one bound state.
5.5.2 Scattering States (E>0)
For a particle of energy E=ℏ2k2/(2m) incident from the left:
ψ(x)={eikx+Re−ikxTeikxx<0x>0
Applying the matching conditions at x=0:
1+R=T,ik(T−1−R)=−ℏ22mαT
Solving:
T=ik−mα/ℏ2ik=1+imα/(ℏ2k)1
R=ik−mα/ℏ2−mα/ℏ2=ik+mα/ℏ2−imα/ℏ2
The transmission and reflection coefficients:
∣T∣2=1+(mα)2/(ℏ4k2)1=1+mα2/(2ℏ2E)1,∣R∣2=1−∣T∣2
Note that even for very high energies (E→∞), ∣R∣2→(mα)2/(ℏ4k2)=0: The delta function always reflects some probability, unlike a smooth potential which becomes Transparent at high energies. This is because the delta function has an infinitely sharp feature At x=0 that scatters waves of all wavelengths.
5.6 Quantum Tunnelling
Consider a rectangular barrier V(x)=V0 for 0<x<a and V(x)=0 otherwise, with E<V0.
Inside the barrier, the Schrodinger equation gives exponentially decaying and growing solutions:
ψ(x)=Ceκx+De−κx,κ=ℏ22m(V0−E)
For a thick barrier (κa≫1), the growing solution Ceκx is negligible at the Far edge, and the transmission coefficient simplifies to:
T≈V0216E(V0−E)e−2κa
The exponential factor e−2κa is the hallmark of quantum tunnelling: the probability of Penetration decreases exponentially with barrier width and height.
:::caution Common Pitfall Tunnelling does not violate energy conservation. The particle does not “have” energy V0 inside The barrier; rather, the wave function extends into the classically forbidden region with Exponentially decreasing amplitude. The particle’s energy is E<V0 throughout. :::
Example 5.2. An electron with E=5 eV approaches a barrier of height V0=10 eV and Width a=0.5 nm. Calculate T.
The electron has roughly a 0.004% chance of tunnelling through this barrier.
Application: alpha decay. Alpha decay can be understood as quantum tunnelling through the Coulomb Barrier. The Geiger-Nuttall law, which relates the decay constant to the alpha particle energy, Follows directly from the exponential dependence of T on the barrier width.
Application: scanning tunnelling microscope (STM). In an STM, a small voltage is applied between A sharp tip and a conducting surface. Electrons tunnel across the gap, producing a current that Depends exponentially on the tip-surface distance: I∝e−2κd. This allows atomic- Resolution imaging of surfaces, as a change in distance of 0.1 nm changes the current by a factor Of about 10.