Skip to content

Fermi Gas at Finite Temperature

At finite temperature, the Fermi-Dirac distribution “smears out” the step function at εF\varepsilon_F. The Sommerfeld expansion provides an asymptotic series for integrals of the form

I=∫0∞f(ε)eβ(ε−μ)+1 dεI = \int_0^\infty \frac{f(\varepsilon)}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1}\, d\varepsilon

When kBT≪εFk_BT \ll \varepsilon_F (the degenerate limit).

Theorem 4.1 (Sommerfeld Expansion). To leading order in T/TFT/T_F:

I=∫0μf(ε) dε+π26(kBT)2f"(μ)+O(T4)I = \int_0^\mu f(\varepsilon)\, d\varepsilon + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 f"(\mu) + \mathcal{O}(T^4)

Proof (sketch). Write f(ε)=f(μ)+f′(μ)(ε−μ)+⋯f(\varepsilon) = f(\mu) + f'(\mu)(\varepsilon - \mu) + \cdots and use the exact results:

∫0∞dεeβ(ε−μ)+1=μ+O(T4)\int_0^\infty \frac{d\varepsilon}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1} = \mu + \mathcal{O}(T^4)

∫0∞(ε−μ) dεeβ(ε−μ)+1=π26(kBT)2\int_0^\infty \frac{(\varepsilon - \mu)\, d\varepsilon}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2

∫0∞(ε−μ)2 dεeβ(ε−μ)+1=O(T4)\int_0^\infty \frac{(\varepsilon - \mu)^2\, d\varepsilon}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1} = \mathcal{O}(T^4)

Combining these with the Taylor expansion of f(ε)f(\varepsilon) gives the result. The key integral identities follow from the substitution x=β(ε−μ)x = \beta(\varepsilon - \mu) and the fact that the integrand is an odd function of xx to leading order. ■\blacksquare

4.2 Chemical Potential at Finite Temperature

Section titled “4.2 Chemical Potential at Finite Temperature”

Applying the Sommerfeld expansion to the number equation N=∫0∞g(ε)fFD(ε) dεN = \int_0^\infty g(\varepsilon) f_{\mathrm{FD}(\varepsilon)\, d\varepsilon} with g(ε)=Cεg(\varepsilon) = C\sqrt{\varepsilon}:

N=23Cμ3/2+π26(kBT)2⋅C2μ+O(T4)N = \frac{2}{3}C\mu^{3/2} + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 \cdot \frac{C}{2\sqrt{\mu}} + \mathcal{O}(T^4)

At T=0T = 0: N=23CεF3/2N = \frac{2}{3}C\varepsilon_F^{3/2}. Expanding μ=εF+δμ\mu = \varepsilon_F + \delta\mu and keeping terms to O(T2)\mathcal{O}(T^2):

μ(T)≈εF[1−π212(kBTεF)2]\mu(T) \approx \varepsilon_F\left[1 - \frac{\pi^2}{12}\left(\frac{k_BT}{\varepsilon_F}\right)^2\right]

The chemical potential decreases slightly with temperature.

Applying the Sommerfeld expansion to the energy:

U=∫0∞ε g(ε) fFD(ε) dε=25Cμ5/2+π26(kBT)2⋅32Cμ1/2+⋯U = \int_0^\infty \varepsilon\, g(\varepsilon)\, f_{\mathrm{FD}(\varepsilon)\, d\varepsilon = \frac{2}{5}C\mu^{5/2} + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 \cdot \frac{3}{2}C\mu^{1/2} + \cdots}

Substituting μ≈εF\mu \approx \varepsilon_F:

U≈35NεF[1+5π212(kBTεF)2]U \approx \frac{3}{5}N\varepsilon_F\left[1 + \frac{5\pi^2}{12}\left(\frac{k_BT}{\varepsilon_F}\right)^2\right]

CV=∂U∂T=NkB⋅π22kBTεF=NkB⋅π22TTFC_V = \frac{\partial U}{\partial T} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{k_BT}{\varepsilon_F} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{T}{T_F}

Physical insight. At room temperature (T≈300T \approx 300 K), T/TF≈0.006T/T_F \approx 0.006 for copper, so CV≈0.03NkBC_V \approx 0.03 Nk_BWhich is negligible compared to the lattice contribution ≈3NkB\approx 3Nk_B. This explains why the Dulong-Petit law works for metals despite the presence of conduction electrons.

4.4 Worked Example: Electronic Heat Capacity of Copper

Section titled “4.4 Worked Example: Electronic Heat Capacity of Copper”

Problem. Calculate the electronic contribution to CVC_V for copper at T=300T = 300 K. Compare with the lattice contribution. Given: εF=7.0\varepsilon_F = 7.0 eV, Debye temperature ΘD=343\Theta_D = 343 K.

Solution

Electronic contribution:

CVel=NkB⋅π22TTF=NkB⋅π2230081000≈0.018 NkBC_V^{\mathrm{el} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{T}{T_F} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{300}{81000} \approx 0.018\, Nk_B}

Lattice contribution (from the Debye model at T≫ΘDT \gg \Theta_D):

CVlat≈3NkBC_V^{\mathrm{lat} \approx 3Nk_B}

The ratio is:

\frac{C_V^{\mathrm{el}}{C_V^{\mathrm{lat}} \approx \frac{0.018}{3} \approx 0.006}}

The electronic heat capacity is only about 0.6%0.6\% of the lattice contribution at room temperature. At very low temperatures (T≪ΘDT \ll \Theta_D), the lattice contribution falls as T3T^3 while the electronic contribution falls as TTSo the electronic term eventually dominates below a few kelvin.

■\blacksquare

ConceptRelationPhysical Meaning
Sommerfeld expansionI=∫0μf dε+π26(kBT)2f′′(μ)I = \int_0^\mu f\,d\varepsilon + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 f''(\mu)Low-temperature correction to T=0T=0 integrals
Chemical potentialμ(T)≈εF[1−π212(T/TF)2]\mu(T) \approx \varepsilon_F\left[1 - \frac{\pi^2}{12}(T/T_F)^2\right]μ\mu decreases quadratically with TT
Electronic heat cap.CV=NkB⋅π22(T/TF)C_V = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}(T/T_F)Linear in TT, suppressed by T/TF≪1T/T_F \ll 1
Fermi temperatureTF=εF/kBT_F = \varepsilon_F/k_BTemperature scale where quantum effects become important
  • Forgetting the T2T^2 correction sign. The chemical potential decreases with temperature, not increases. Fix: The Sommerfeld expansion gives μ<εF\mu < \varepsilon_F because thermal excitations populate states above εF\varepsilon_F while leaving holes below, shifting the average.
  • Applying Sommerfeld expansion outside the degenerate regime. When T∼TFT \sim T_F, the expansion parameter (T/TF)2∼1(T/T_F)^2 \sim 1 and the series diverges. Fix: The expansion only converges for kBT≪εFk_BT \ll \varepsilon_F; use full numerical integration otherwise.
  • Confusing TFT_F with TcT_c (critical temperature). Fermi temperature is a property of the ground state, unrelated to phase transitions. Fix: TF=εF/kBT_F = \varepsilon_F/k_B is the degeneracy temperature scale, not a transition temperature.
  • Electronic vs. lattice heat capacity crossover. At room temperature the electronic contribution is negligible, but below ∼10\sim 10 K it dominates. Fix: Compare CVel∝TC_V^{\rm el} \propto T with CVlat∝T3C_V^{\rm lat} \propto T^3 at low TT.
  • Specific heat of metals: The linear TT term in CVC_V at low temperatures is a hallmark of Fermi liquid behaviour and is used to extract the density of states at εF\varepsilon_F.
  • Thermoelectric effect: The Sommerfeld expansion explains the Mott formula for thermopower, relating S∝T⋅d(ln⁡σ)/dεS \propto T \cdot d(\ln \sigma)/d\varepsilon at εF\varepsilon_F.
  • White dwarf cooling: Degenerate electron gas thermodynamics determines the heat capacity and cooling rate of white dwarfs, with TF∼108T_F \sim 10^8 K.
  • Heavy fermion systems: Materials with strongly renormalised effective masses show an enhanced Sommerfeld coefficient γ=CV/T\gamma = C_V/T, signalling strong correlations.

4.8 Worked Example: Sommerfeld Correction to the Electron Density

Section titled “4.8 Worked Example: Sommerfeld Correction to the Electron Density”

Problem. For a 3D free electron gas at T=100T = 100 K with εF=5\varepsilon_F = 5 eV, compute the fractional change in the chemical potential μ(T)\mu(T) relative to εF\varepsilon_F.

Solution. Using μ(T)≈εF[1−(π2/12)(T/TF)2]\mu(T) \approx \varepsilon_F[1 - (\pi^2/12)(T/T_F)^2]:

TF=εF/kB=5  eV/(8.617×10−5  eV/K)≈5.8×104  KT_F = \varepsilon_F/k_B = 5\;\mathrm{eV} / (8.617 \times 10^{-5}\;\mathrm{eV/K}) \approx 5.8 \times 10^4\;\mathrm{K}

TTF=1005.8×104≈1.72×10−3\frac{T}{T_F} = \frac{100}{5.8 \times 10^4} \approx 1.72 \times 10^{-3}

μ−εFεF≈−π212(1.72×10−3)2≈−2.4×10−6\frac{\mu - \varepsilon_F}{\varepsilon_F} \approx -\frac{\pi^2}{12}(1.72 \times 10^{-3})^2 \approx -2.4 \times 10^{-6}

The chemical potential decreases by only about 2.4×10−4%2.4 \times 10^{-4}\%, confirming that μ≈εF\mu \approx \varepsilon_F is an excellent approximation at ordinary temperatures.

■\blacksquare

QuantityT=0T = 0T≪TFT \ll T_F (Sommerfeld)
Chemical potentialμ=εF\mu = \varepsilon_Fμ≈εF[1−π212(T/TF)2]\mu \approx \varepsilon_F[1 - \frac{\pi^2}{12}(T/T_F)^2]
Energy densityU0=35NεFU_0 = \frac{3}{5}N\varepsilon_FU≈U0[1+5π212(T/TF)2]U \approx U_0[1 + \frac{5\pi^2}{12}(T/T_F)^2]
Heat capacity0CV=NkB⋅π22(T/TF)C_V = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}(T/T_F)