Skip to content

Fermi Gas at Finite Temperature

At finite temperature, the Fermi-Dirac distribution “smears out” the step function at εF\varepsilon_F. The Sommerfeld expansion provides an asymptotic series for integrals of the form

I=0f(ε)eβ(εμ)+1dεI = \int_0^\infty \frac{f(\varepsilon)}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1}\, d\varepsilon

When kBTεFk_BT \ll \varepsilon_F (the degenerate limit).

Theorem 4.1 (Sommerfeld Expansion). To leading order in T/TFT/T_F:

I=0μf(ε)dε+π26(kBT)2f"(μ)+O(T4)I = \int_0^\mu f(\varepsilon)\, d\varepsilon + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 f"(\mu) + \mathcal{O}(T^4)

Proof (sketch). Write f(ε)=f(μ)+f(μ)(εμ)+f(\varepsilon) = f(\mu) + f'(\mu)(\varepsilon - \mu) + \cdots and use the exact results:

0dεeβ(εμ)+1=μ+O(T4)\int_0^\infty \frac{d\varepsilon}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1} = \mu + \mathcal{O}(T^4)

0(εμ)dεeβ(εμ)+1=π26(kBT)2\int_0^\infty \frac{(\varepsilon - \mu)\, d\varepsilon}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2

0(εμ)2dεeβ(εμ)+1=O(T4)\int_0^\infty \frac{(\varepsilon - \mu)^2\, d\varepsilon}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon - \mu)} + 1} = \mathcal{O}(T^4)

Combining these with the Taylor expansion of f(ε)f(\varepsilon) gives the result. The key integral identities follow from the substitution x=β(εμ)x = \beta(\varepsilon - \mu) and the fact that the integrand is an odd function of xx to leading order. \blacksquare

4.2 Chemical Potential at Finite Temperature

Section titled “4.2 Chemical Potential at Finite Temperature”

Applying the Sommerfeld expansion to the number equation N=0g(ε)fFD(ε)dεN = \int_0^\infty g(\varepsilon) f_{\mathrm{FD}(\varepsilon)\, d\varepsilon} with g(ε)=Cεg(\varepsilon) = C\sqrt{\varepsilon}:

N=23Cμ3/2+π26(kBT)2C2μ+O(T4)N = \frac{2}{3}C\mu^{3/2} + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 \cdot \frac{C}{2\sqrt{\mu}} + \mathcal{O}(T^4)

At T=0T = 0: N=23CεF3/2N = \frac{2}{3}C\varepsilon_F^{3/2}. Expanding μ=εF+δμ\mu = \varepsilon_F + \delta\mu and keeping terms to O(T2)\mathcal{O}(T^2):

μ(T)εF[1π212(kBTεF)2]\mu(T) \approx \varepsilon_F\left[1 - \frac{\pi^2}{12}\left(\frac{k_BT}{\varepsilon_F}\right)^2\right]

The chemical potential decreases slightly with temperature.

Applying the Sommerfeld expansion to the energy:

U=0εg(ε)fFD(ε)dε=25Cμ5/2+π26(kBT)232Cμ1/2+U = \int_0^\infty \varepsilon\, g(\varepsilon)\, f_{\mathrm{FD}(\varepsilon)\, d\varepsilon = \frac{2}{5}C\mu^{5/2} + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 \cdot \frac{3}{2}C\mu^{1/2} + \cdots}

Substituting μεF\mu \approx \varepsilon_F:

U35NεF[1+5π212(kBTεF)2]U \approx \frac{3}{5}N\varepsilon_F\left[1 + \frac{5\pi^2}{12}\left(\frac{k_BT}{\varepsilon_F}\right)^2\right]

CV=UT=NkBπ22kBTεF=NkBπ22TTFC_V = \frac{\partial U}{\partial T} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{k_BT}{\varepsilon_F} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{T}{T_F}

Physical insight. At room temperature (T300T \approx 300 K), T/TF0.006T/T_F \approx 0.006 for copper, so CV0.03NkBC_V \approx 0.03 Nk_BWhich is negligible compared to the lattice contribution 3NkB\approx 3Nk_B. This explains why the Dulong-Petit law works for metals despite the presence of conduction electrons.

4.4 Worked Example: Electronic Heat Capacity of Copper

Section titled “4.4 Worked Example: Electronic Heat Capacity of Copper”

Problem. Calculate the electronic contribution to CVC_V for copper at T=300T = 300 K. Compare with the lattice contribution. Given: εF=7.0\varepsilon_F = 7.0 eV, Debye temperature ΘD=343\Theta_D = 343 K.

Solution

Electronic contribution:

CVel=NkBπ22TTF=NkBπ22300810000.018NkBC_V^{\mathrm{el} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{T}{T_F} = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{300}{81000} \approx 0.018\, Nk_B}

Lattice contribution (from the Debye model at TΘDT \gg \Theta_D):

CVlat3NkBC_V^{\mathrm{lat} \approx 3Nk_B}

The ratio is:

\frac{C_V^{\mathrm{el}}{C_V^{\mathrm{lat}} \approx \frac{0.018}{3} \approx 0.006}}

The electronic heat capacity is only about 0.6%0.6\% of the lattice contribution at room temperature. At very low temperatures (TΘDT \ll \Theta_D), the lattice contribution falls as T3T^3 while the electronic contribution falls as TTSo the electronic term eventually dominates below a few kelvin.

\blacksquare

ConceptRelationPhysical Meaning
Sommerfeld expansionI=0μfdε+π26(kBT)2f(μ)I = \int_0^\mu f\,d\varepsilon + \frac{\pi^2}{6}(k_BT)^2 f''(\mu)Low-temperature correction to T=0T=0 integrals
Chemical potentialμ(T)εF[1π212(T/TF)2]\mu(T) \approx \varepsilon_F\left[1 - \frac{\pi^2}{12}(T/T_F)^2\right]μ\mu decreases quadratically with TT
Electronic heat cap.CV=NkBπ22(T/TF)C_V = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}(T/T_F)Linear in TT, suppressed by T/TF1T/T_F \ll 1
Fermi temperatureTF=εF/kBT_F = \varepsilon_F/k_BTemperature scale where quantum effects become important
  • Forgetting the T2T^2 correction sign. The chemical potential decreases with temperature, not increases. Fix: The Sommerfeld expansion gives μ<εF\mu < \varepsilon_F because thermal excitations populate states above εF\varepsilon_F while leaving holes below, shifting the average.
  • Applying Sommerfeld expansion outside the degenerate regime. When TTFT \sim T_F, the expansion parameter (T/TF)21(T/T_F)^2 \sim 1 and the series diverges. Fix: The expansion only converges for kBTεFk_BT \ll \varepsilon_F; use full numerical integration otherwise.
  • Confusing TFT_F with TcT_c (critical temperature). Fermi temperature is a property of the ground state, unrelated to phase transitions. Fix: TF=εF/kBT_F = \varepsilon_F/k_B is the degeneracy temperature scale, not a transition temperature.
  • Electronic vs. lattice heat capacity crossover. At room temperature the electronic contribution is negligible, but below 10\sim 10 K it dominates. Fix: Compare CVelTC_V^{\rm el} \propto T with CVlatT3C_V^{\rm lat} \propto T^3 at low TT.
  • Specific heat of metals: The linear TT term in CVC_V at low temperatures is a hallmark of Fermi liquid behaviour and is used to extract the density of states at εF\varepsilon_F.
  • Thermoelectric effect: The Sommerfeld expansion explains the Mott formula for thermopower, relating STd(lnσ)/dεS \propto T \cdot d(\ln \sigma)/d\varepsilon at εF\varepsilon_F.
  • White dwarf cooling: Degenerate electron gas thermodynamics determines the heat capacity and cooling rate of white dwarfs, with TF108T_F \sim 10^8 K.
  • Heavy fermion systems: Materials with strongly renormalised effective masses show an enhanced Sommerfeld coefficient γ=CV/T\gamma = C_V/T, signalling strong correlations.

4.8 Worked Example: Sommerfeld Correction to the Electron Density

Section titled “4.8 Worked Example: Sommerfeld Correction to the Electron Density”

Problem. For a 3D free electron gas at T=100T = 100 K with εF=5\varepsilon_F = 5 eV, compute the fractional change in the chemical potential μ(T)\mu(T) relative to εF\varepsilon_F.

Solution. Using μ(T)εF[1(π2/12)(T/TF)2]\mu(T) \approx \varepsilon_F[1 - (\pi^2/12)(T/T_F)^2]:

TF=εF/kB=5  eV/(8.617×105  eV/K)5.8×104  KT_F = \varepsilon_F/k_B = 5\;\mathrm{eV} / (8.617 \times 10^{-5}\;\mathrm{eV/K}) \approx 5.8 \times 10^4\;\mathrm{K}

TTF=1005.8×1041.72×103\frac{T}{T_F} = \frac{100}{5.8 \times 10^4} \approx 1.72 \times 10^{-3}

μεFεFπ212(1.72×103)22.4×106\frac{\mu - \varepsilon_F}{\varepsilon_F} \approx -\frac{\pi^2}{12}(1.72 \times 10^{-3})^2 \approx -2.4 \times 10^{-6}

The chemical potential decreases by only about 2.4×104%2.4 \times 10^{-4}\%, confirming that μεF\mu \approx \varepsilon_F is an excellent approximation at ordinary temperatures.

\blacksquare

QuantityT=0T = 0TTFT \ll T_F (Sommerfeld)
Chemical potentialμ=εF\mu = \varepsilon_FμεF[1π212(T/TF)2]\mu \approx \varepsilon_F[1 - \frac{\pi^2}{12}(T/T_F)^2]
Energy densityU0=35NεFU_0 = \frac{3}{5}N\varepsilon_FUU0[1+5π212(T/TF)2]U \approx U_0[1 + \frac{5\pi^2}{12}(T/T_F)^2]
Heat capacity0CV=NkBπ22(T/TF)C_V = Nk_B \cdot \frac{\pi^2}{2}(T/T_F)