Skip to content

Thermodynamic Response Functions

17.1 General Relations

Response functions measure how thermodynamic quantities change with state variables. The most important are:

  • Heat capacity: CX=T(S/T)XC_X = T(\partial S/\partial T)_X
  • Compressibility: κT=1V(V/P)T\kappa_T = -\frac{1}{V}(\partial V/\partial P)_T
  • Thermal expansion: α=1V(V/T)P\alpha = \frac{1}{V}(\partial V/\partial T)_P

These satisfy the identity:

CPCV=TVα2κTC_P - C_V = TV\frac{\alpha^2}{\kappa_T}

For an ideal gas (α=1/T\alpha = 1/T, κT=1/P\kappa_T = 1/P):

CPCV=TV1T2P=NkBC_P - C_V = TV \cdot \frac{1}{T^2} \cdot P = Nk_B

17.2 Maxwell Relations

From the exact differentials of thermodynamic potentials:

PotentialDifferentialMaxwell Relation
dU=TdSPdVdU = TdS - PdV(T/V)S=(P/S)V(\partial T/\partial V)_S = -(\partial P/\partial S)_V
dH=TdS+VdPdH = TdS + VdP(T/P)S=(V/S)P(\partial T/\partial P)_S = (\partial V/\partial S)_P
dF=SdTPdVdF = -SdT - PdV(S/V)T=(P/T)V(\partial S/\partial V)_T = (\partial P/\partial T)_V
dG=SdT+VdPdG = -SdT + VdP(S/P)T=(V/T)P(\partial S/\partial P)_T = -(\partial V/\partial T)_P

17.3 Jacobian Formalism

Thermodynamic derivatives can be systematically manipulated using the Jacobian notation:

(x,y)(u,v)=(x/u)v(x/v)u(y/u)v(y/v)u\frac{\partial(x, y)}{\partial(u, v)} = \begin{vmatrix} (\partial x/\partial u)_v & (\partial x/\partial v)_u \\ (\partial y/\partial u)_v & (\partial y/\partial v)_u \end{vmatrix}

Properties:

  • (x/y)z=(x,z)(y,z)(\partial x/\partial y)_z = \frac{\partial(x,z)}{\partial(y,z)}
  • Chain rule: (x,y)(u,v)=(x,y)(w,z)(w,z)(u,v)\frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(u,v)} = \frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(w,z)}\cdot\frac{\partial(w,z)}{\partial(u,v)}
  • Triple product: (x/y)z(y/z)x(z/x)y=1(\partial x/\partial y)_z (\partial y/\partial z)_x (\partial z/\partial x)_y = -1
Worked Example 17.1: $C_P/C_V$ Ratio from Thermodynamic Derivatives

Starting from CPCV=TVα2/κTC_P - C_V = TV\alpha^2/\kappa_T:

CPCV=1+TVα2κTCV\frac{C_P}{C_V} = 1 + \frac{TV\alpha^2}{\kappa_T C_V}

For an ideal monatomic gas (CV=3NkB/2C_V = 3Nk_B/2):

CPCV=1+NkB3NkB/2=1+23=53\frac{C_P}{C_V} = 1 + \frac{Nk_B}{3Nk_B/2} = 1 + \frac{2}{3} = \frac{5}{3}

For a diatomic gas at room temperature (CV=5NkB/2C_V = 5Nk_B/2):

CPCV=1+NkB5NkB/2=1+25=75=1.4\frac{C_P}{C_V} = 1 + \frac{Nk_B}{5Nk_B/2} = 1 + \frac{2}{5} = \frac{7}{5} = 1.4

Common Pitfalls

  1. Confusing ensembles: The microcanonical ensemble describes isolated systems (fixed E,N,VE, N, V), the canonical ensemble systems in thermal contact with a heat bath (fixed T,N,VT, N, V), and the grand canonical ensemble systems exchanging both energy and particles (fixed T,μ,VT, \mu, V). They give the same results in the thermodynamic limit, but differ for small systems.

  2. Negative temperatures: These occur only for systems with a bounded energy spectrum (e.g., spin systems). A negative temperature is actually hotter than any positive temperature (T=T = -\infty is the hottest positive temperature, and T=0T = 0^- is the coldest). They are not applicable to systems like the ideal gas.

  3. BEC critical density: The critical density for BEC in a box is nc=ζ(3/2)(mkBT/2π2)3/2n_c = \zeta(3/2)(mk_BT/2\pi\hbar^2)^{3/2}. This is extremely low (1014\sim 10^{14} cm3^{-3} at 1 μ\muK for Rb), but BEC in real experiments requires much lower temperatures because of the need to reach quantum degeneracy in a finite trap.

  4. Mean-field overestimates TcT_c: The mean-field approximation TcMF=zJ/kBT_c^{\text{MF} = zJ/k_B} systematically overestimates the true critical temperature because it neglects fluctuations. The error is largest in low dimensions (where fluctuations are strongest) and vanishes above the upper critical dimension (d=4d = 4 for short-range Ising).

  5. Classical vs. Quantum …/4-statistics-and-probability/2_statistics: At temperatures much higher than the degeneracy temperature TFT_F (fermions) or TcT_c (bosons), both Fermi—Dirac and Bose—Einstein distributions reduce to the Maxwell—Boltzmann distribution. The quantum corrections are of order nλdB3n\lambda_{\text{dB}^3} where λdB=h/2πmkBT\lambda_{\text{dB} = h/\sqrt{2\pi mk_BT}} is the thermal de Broglie wavelength.

Problems

Problem 1: Entropy of Mixing

Consider two ideal gases A and B, initially separated by a partition in a container of volume VV. Gas A has NAN_A particles in volume VAV_A; gas B has NBN_B particles in volume VBV_BWith VA+VB=VV_A + V_B = V. The partition is removed and the gases mix isothermally at temperature TT.

(a) Show that the entropy of mixing is:

ΔSmix=NkB[xlnx+(1x)ln(1x)]NkB[ylny+(1y)ln(1y)]\Delta S_{\text{mix} = -Nk_B\left[x\ln x + (1-x)\ln(1-x)\right] - Nk_B\left[y\ln y + (1-y)\ln(1-y)\right]}

Where x=NA/Nx = N_A/N, y=VA/Vy = V_A/V.

(b) Evaluate ΔSmix\Delta S_{\text{mix}} for NA=NB=N0N_A = N_B = N_0, VA=VB=V/2V_A = V_B = V/2 and show ΔSmix=2N0kBln2\Delta S_{\text{mix} = 2N_0k_B\ln 2}.

(c) Gibbs paradox: If gases A and B are identical, the actual entropy change is zero. Explain how the factor of 1/N!1/N! in the partition function resolves this paradox.

Solution:

(a) For ideal gas A initially in VAV_A and finally in VV:

ΔSA=NAkBlnVVA=NAkBln1y=NkBxlny\Delta S_A = N_Ak_B\ln\frac{V}{V_A} = N_Ak_B\ln\frac{1}{y} = -Nk_B x\ln y

Similarly ΔSB=NkB(1x)ln(1y)\Delta S_B = -Nk_B(1-x)\ln(1-y). The total:

ΔS=NkB[xlny+(1x)ln(1y)]\Delta S = -Nk_B[x\ln y + (1-x)\ln(1-y)]

Note: The more general form includes contributions from the number of particles.

(b) With x=1/2x = 1/2, y=1/2y = 1/2:

ΔS=2N0kB(12ln12)=2N0kB(12ln2)=2N0kBln2\Delta S = -2N_0k_B\left(\frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{1}{2}\right) = -2N_0k_B\left(-\frac{1}{2}\ln 2\right) = 2N_0k_B\ln 2

(c) The Sackur—Tetrode equation includes NkBlnN+NkB=kBlnN!-Nk_B\ln N + Nk_B = -k_B\ln N!Which accounts for the indistinguishability of particles. For identical gases, the “before” and “after” states are the same (same NN, VV, EE), so ΔS=0\Delta S = 0. Without the 1/N!1/N! factor, we would get the same non-zero result for mixing identical gases — Gibbs” paradox.

Problem 2: Ising Model Phase Diagram

Consider the mean-field Ising model on a square lattice (z=4z = 4).

(a) Find the magnetization mm as a function of reduced temperature t=T/TcMFt = T/T_c^{\text{MF}} in zero field.

(b) Find the susceptibility χ\chi on both sides of TcT_c.

(c) Calculate the specific heat jump at TcT_c.

Solution:

(a) The self-consistency equation is m=tanh(4βJm)=tanh(m/t)m = \tanh(4\beta Jm) = \tanh(m/t) since TcMF=4J/kBT_c^{\text{MF} = 4J/k_B}.

For t<1t < 1: mm satisfies m=tanh(m/t)m = \tanh(m/t). For small m/tm/t:

mmt13(mt)3    m=3(1t)t3(1t)1/2 nearTcm \approx \frac{m}{t} - \frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{m}{t}\right)^3 \implies m = \sqrt{3(1-t)}\, t \approx \sqrt{3}\,(1-t)^{1/2} \text{ near} T_c

(b) From the Landau analysis: χTTc1\chi \propto |T - T_c|^{-1}I.e., γ=1\gamma = 1.

Explicitly: χ1=kBT(1t1sech2(m/t))\chi^{-1} = k_B T(1 - t^{-1}\text{sech}^2(m/t)). Near TcT_c: χ1/(TTc)\chi \sim 1/(T - T_c).

(c) The specific heat jump is:

ΔC=3NkB2=1.5NkB\Delta C = \frac{3Nk_B}{2} = 1.5\, Nk_B

(derived from the mean-field free energy f=12kBTcm2+14kBTcm4f = \frac{1}{2}k_BT_c m^2 + \frac{1}{4}k_BT_c m^4 near TcT_c.)

Problem 3: Photon Gas and Blackbody Radiation

Photons are massless bosons with zero chemical potential (μ=0\mu = 0).

(a) Show that the Planck distribution for the photon number in mode ω\omega is nω=1/(eβω1)\langle n_\omega \rangle = 1/(e^{\beta\hbar\omega} - 1).

(b) Derive the Stefan—Boltzmann law for the total energy density: u=aT4u = aT^4 where a=π2kB4/(153c3)a = \pi^2k_B^4/(15\hbar^3 c^3).

(c) The cosmic microwave background has T=2.725T = 2.725 K. Calculate the photon energy density and number density.

Solution:

(a) For bosons with μ=0\mu = 0: n=1/(eβϵ1)\langle n \rangle = 1/(e^{\beta\epsilon} - 1). With ϵ=ω\epsilon = \hbar\omega: nω=1/(eβω1)\langle n_\omega \rangle = 1/(e^{\beta\hbar\omega} - 1).

(b) Density of photon states in 3D: g(ω)=Vω2/(π2c3)g(\omega) = V\omega^2/(\pi^2 c^3) (2 polarizations).

u=1V0ωnωg(ω)dω=π2c30ω3eβω1dωu = \frac{1}{V}\int_0^\infty \hbar\omega\,\langle n_\omega \rangle\, g(\omega)\, d\omega = \frac{\hbar}{\pi^2 c^3}\int_0^\infty \frac{\omega^3}{e^{\beta\hbar\omega} - 1}\, d\omega

With x=βωx = \beta\hbar\omega:

u=(kBT)4π23c30x3ex1dx=(kBT)4π23c3π415=π2kB4153c3T4u = \frac{(k_BT)^4}{\pi^2\hbar^3 c^3}\int_0^\infty \frac{x^3}{e^x - 1}\, dx = \frac{(k_BT)^4}{\pi^2\hbar^3 c^3}\cdot\frac{\pi^4}{15} = \frac{\pi^2 k_B^4}{15\hbar^3 c^3}\, T^4

(c) u=aT4u = aT^4 with a=7.566×1016a = 7.566 \times 10^{-16} J\cdotm3^{-3}, \cdotK4^{-4}:

u=7.566×1016×(2.725)4=7.566×1016×55.15=4.17×1014 J/m3u = 7.566 \times 10^{-16} \times (2.725)^4 = 7.566 \times 10^{-16} \times 55.15 = 4.17 \times 10^{-14} \text{ J/m}^3

Number density:

nγ=2ζ(3)π2(kBTc)3=2×1.202π2(1.38×1023×2.7251.055×1034×3×108)3n_\gamma = \frac{2\zeta(3)}{\pi^2}\left(\frac{k_BT}{\hbar c}\right)^3 = \frac{2 \times 1.202}{\pi^2}\left(\frac{1.38 \times 10^{-23} \times 2.725}{1.055 \times 10^{-34} \times 3 \times 10^8}\right)^3

=0.244×(1.193×103)30.244×1.698×1094.14×108 m3= 0.244 \times (1.193 \times 10^3)^3 \approx 0.244 \times 1.698 \times 10^9 \approx 4.14 \times 10^8 \text{ m}^{-3}

Problem 4: Chemical Equilibrium

For the dissociation reaction \text{H_2} \rightleftharpoons 2\text{H}The equilibrium constant is:

K(T)=nH2nH2=(mHkBT2π2)3/2(jH+1)22jH2+11ZrotZvibeD/(kBT)K(T) = \frac{n_H^2}{n_{H_2}} = \left(\frac{m_H k_B T}{2\pi\hbar^2}\right)^{3/2}\frac{(j_H + 1)^2}{2j_{H_2} + 1}\frac{1}{Z_{\text{rot}Z_{\text{vib}}e^{-D/(k_BT)}}}

Where D=4.52D = 4.52 eV is the dissociation energy, jH=1/2j_H = 1/2, jH2=1j_{H_2} = 1.

(a) At T=3000T = 3000 K, estimate the fraction of hydrogen that is dissociated.

(b) How does the degree of dissociation change with temperature and pressure?

Solution:

(a) At T=3000T = 3000 K, kBT=0.259k_BT = 0.259 eV, so D/(kBT)=17.5D/(k_BT) = 17.5Giving e17.52.5×108e^{-17.5} \approx 2.5 \times 10^{-8}.

The translational factor: (mHkBT/2π2)3/2(2.5×1030)3/2×(3000)3/21035(m_H k_B T / 2\pi\hbar^2)^{3/2} \approx (2.5 \times 10^{30})^{3/2} \times (3000)^{3/2} \approx 10^{35} m3^{-3}.

With rotational and vibrational partition functions at this temperature, K1027K \sim 10^{27} m3^{-3} (very rough estimate).

For a gas at P=1P = 1 atm, ntotal=P/(kBT)2.4×1025n_{\text{total} = P/(k_BT) \approx 2.4 \times 10^{25}} m3^{-3}. Setting nH2ntotal/2n_{H_2} \approx n_{\text{total}/2}:

nH=KnH21027×10251026n_H = \sqrt{K \cdot n_{H_2}} \sim \sqrt{10^{27} \times 10^{25}} \sim 10^{26}

This suggests nearly complete dissociation at 3000 K and 1 atm (consistent with the known behavior of hydrogen at these temperatures).

(b) Increasing temperature exponentially increases dissociation (via eD/(kBT)e^{-D/(k_BT)}). Increasing pressure (at fixed TT) decreases dissociation because the reaction produces 2 moles from 1 mole (Δn>0\Delta n > 0), so Le Chatelier’s principle shifts equilibrium toward H2_2.

Problem 5: Grand Canonical Ensemble

Consider a system in the grand canonical ensemble with chemical potential μ\muTemperature TTAnd volume VV.

(a) Derive the relation between the average particle number fluctuations and the isothermal compressibility:

N2N2N=nkBTκT\frac{\langle N^2 \rangle - \langle N \rangle^2}{\langle N \rangle} = n k_B T \kappa_T

Where n=N/Vn = N/V.

(b) Evaluate this for an ideal gas and show (ΔN)2=N\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle = \langle N \rangle.

(c) For a Fermi gas at T=0T = 0Show (ΔN)2=0\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle = 0 and explain physically.

Solution:

(a) In the grand canonical ensemble:

N=1βlnZμ\langle N \rangle = \frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\partial \ln \mathcal{Z}}{\partial \mu}

(ΔN)2=N2N2=1βNμ=1βμ(PVkBT)=VPμ\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle = \langle N^2 \rangle - \langle N \rangle^2 = \frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\partial \langle N \rangle}{\partial \mu} = \frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\mu}\left(\frac{PV}{k_BT}\right) = V\frac{\partial P}{\partial \mu}

Using dμ=sdT+vdPd\mu = -s\,dT + v\,dP at constant TT: (μ/P)T=v=1/n(\partial\mu/\partial P)_T = v = 1/n.

(ΔN)2=V(μ/P)T=nV=NnkBTκT\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle = \frac{V}{(\partial\mu/\partial P)_T} = nV = \langle N \rangle \cdot nk_B T \kappa_T

Wait, more carefully:

(ΔN)2=kBTNμ=kBTVnμ=kBTVnPPμ\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle = k_BT \frac{\partial \langle N \rangle}{\partial \mu} = k_BT V \frac{\partial n}{\partial \mu} = k_BT V \frac{\partial n}{\partial P}\frac{\partial P}{\partial \mu}

Since (P/μ)T=n(\partial P/\partial \mu)_T = n (from dG=SdT+VdP+μdNdG = -SdT + VdP + \mu dNOr P=nkBTP = nk_BT for ideal gas):

(ΔN)2N=kBTnP=nkBTκT\frac{\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle}{\langle N \rangle} = k_BT \frac{\partial n}{\partial P} = nk_B T\kappa_T

Where κT=1V(V/P)T=1n(n/P)T\kappa_T = -\frac{1}{V}(\partial V/\partial P)_T = \frac{1}{n}(\partial n/\partial P)_T.

(b) For ideal gas: κT=1/P=1/(nkBT)\kappa_T = 1/P = 1/(nk_BT)So:

(ΔN)2N=nkBT1nkBT=1    (ΔN)2=N\frac{\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle}{\langle N \rangle} = nk_BT \cdot \frac{1}{nk_BT} = 1 \implies \langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle = \langle N \rangle

This is the standard Poisson …/4-statistics-and-probability/2_statistics result for non-interacting particles.

(c) At T=0T = 0The Fermi gas is in its ground state with exactly NN particles filling all states up to ϵF\epsilon_F. There are no particle number fluctuations: (ΔN)2=0\langle(\Delta N)^2\rangle = 0. Physically, this is because adding or removing a particle costs a finite energy ϵF\epsilon_FSo the chemical potential is infinitely sharp.