Generalised Coordinates and Constraints
2.1 Generalised Coordinates
A system with degrees of freedom can be described by generalised coordinates Which may be angles, arc lengths, or any other set of parameters that Uniquely determines the configuration.
The Cartesian coordinates are functions of the generalised coordinates (and possibly time):
The velocities are:
Example. A simple pendulum has one degree of freedom. We can use the angle from the Vertical as the generalised coordinate, rather than the Cartesian coordinates of the bob.
2.2 Constraints
Holonomic constraints relate the coordinates by equations:
A holonomic constraint reduces the number of degrees of freedom.
Non-holonomic constraints involve inequalities or non-integrable differential relations:
Which cannot be integrated to yield a relation among the alone.
Scleronomic constraints do not depend explicitly on time. Rheonomic constraints do.
Example. A bead sliding on a fixed wire: the constraint is holonomic and scleronomic. A bead on a wire that moves with time: holonomic and rheonomic.
2.3 Worked Example: Classifying Constraints
Problem. Classify the following constraints: (a) a particle on the surface of a sphere of radius (b) a rolling disk (vertical), (c) a particle constrained to (d) a pendulum whose pivot oscillates as .
Solution
(a) Constraint: . Holonomic (an equation relating coordinates), scleronomic (no explicit time dependence).
(b) A vertical disk of radius rolling without slipping on a horizontal plane. The rolling condition gives and . These cannot be integrated to eliminate the angles, so they are non-holonomic, scleronomic.
(c) Constraint: . This is a non-holonomic constraint (an inequality, not an equation).
(d) The constraint is Which depends explicitly on . Holonomic (can be written as an equation), rheonomic (explicit time dependence).
2.4 Worked Example: Finding Generalised Coordinates
Problem. A rod of length and negligible mass has masses and at its ends. The rod slides on a frictionless horizontal table. Find suitable generalised coordinates.
Solution
The rod is in a plane, and the two masses have four Cartesian coordinates . The constraint is the fixed distance: . This is one holonomic scleronomic constraint, reducing the four coordinates to three degrees of freedom.
We can choose the centre of mass and the angle the rod makes with the -axis:
Then:
2.5 Virtual Work and D”Alembert’s Principle
A virtual displacement is an infinitesimal change in position consistent with The constraints at a fixed instant in time ().
Definition (Virtual Work). The virtual work of the forces is:
Definition (Ideal Constraints). Constraints are ideal if the virtual work of the constraint forces is zero:
Where is the constraint force on particle .
Theorem 2.1 (Principle of Virtual Work). A system is in static equilibrium if and only if the virtual work of the applied forces vanishes for all virtual displacements consistent with the constraints.
Proof. In static equilibrium, for each particle. Therefore:
For ideal constraints, So . Conversely, if the virtual work of applied forces vanishes for all admissible virtual displacements, the system must be in equilibrium (otherwise one could choose a virtual displacement in the direction of net force to get non-zero work).
Theorem 2.2 (D’Alembert’s Principle). For a system of particles:
Where includes both applied and constraint forces. For ideal constraints, the Constraint forces do no virtual work, so only the applied forces contribute.
Proof. D’Alembert’s principle extends the principle of virtual work to dynamics by treating as a “fictitious force” (the inertia force). Starting from Newton’s second law :
This is true. For ideal constraints Giving: