Cauchy's Theorem
5.1 Statement
Section titled “5.1 Statement”Theorem 5.1 (Cauchy”s Theorem). If is analytic on a connected domain and Is a simple closed contour in Then
Proof (for continuous). By Green’s theorem in the plane, writing :
Applying Green’s theorem to each integral:
By the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
5.2 Connected Domains
Section titled “5.2 Connected Domains”A domain is ** connected** if every simple closed contour in can Be continuously shrunk to a point within .
Cauchy’s theorem may fail on multiply connected domains. For example, where is the unit circle (traversing a region that Excludes the singularity at ).
5.3 Path Independence
Section titled “5.3 Path Independence”Corollary 5.2. If is analytic on a connected domain Then the integral is independent of the path from to in .
5.4 Antiderivatives
Section titled “5.4 Antiderivatives”Theorem 5.3. If is analytic on a connected domain Then has an antiderivative in (i.e., ), and
Where and are the endpoints of .
5.5 Cauchy’s Theorem for Multiply Connected Domains
Section titled “5.5 Cauchy’s Theorem for Multiply Connected Domains”Theorem 5.4. If is analytic on a domain containing simple closed contours where Lie in the interior of and the region between and the is contained in And all contours are positively oriented, then
5.6 Deformation of Contours
Section titled “5.6 Deformation of Contours”Theorem 5.5 (Deformation of Contours). If is analytic on a domain containing two simple Closed contours and where one can be continuously deformed into the other Within the domain of analyticity of Then
Proof. This follows directly from Theorem 5.4 applied to the region between and .
Remark. This theorem is enormously useful: we can replace a complicated contour with a simpler one (a small circle around each singularity) without changing the value of the integral.
Solution
Problem. Evaluate where is the ellipse .
Since is inside the ellipse and is analytic everywhere else, By deformation of contours we can replace with a small circle around :
.
Problem. Evaluate where is the square with vertices .
is analytic on and inside except at . By deformation: .
Problem. Evaluate where is .
.
Both are inside .
.
Common Pitfalls
Section titled “Common Pitfalls”- Assuming Cauchy’s theorem applies to any closed contour: The theorem requires to be analytic on a simply connected domain containing the contour. If the contour encloses any singularity, the integral may be non-zero.
- Confusing simply connected with connected: A domain can be connected but not simply connected (e.g., an annulus). Cauchy’s theorem fails on such domains without additional conditions on the contour.
- Applying the deformation theorem outside the domain of analyticity: The contour can only be deformed through regions where remains analytic. Deforming a contour across a singularity changes the value of the integral.
- Forgetting orientation when using the multiply connected theorem: The outer contour and inner contours must be traversed with consistent positive orientation (counterclockwise for the outer, clockwise for the inner) for the equality to hold.
Worked Example: Trigonometric Integrals
Section titled “Worked Example: Trigonometric Integrals”Problem. Evaluate .
Solution. Let , so and .
The denominator factors as . Only the root lies inside . By Cauchy’s theorem applied to the simply connected region after deformation:
Worked Example: Branch Cut Integration
Section titled “Worked Example: Branch Cut Integration”Problem. Evaluate .
Solution. Consider with a branch cut along the positive real axis. Integrate around a keyhole contour consisting of (large circle radius ), (small circle radius ), and two straight segments just above and below the cut. On the upper segment, ; on the lower segment, (due to the phase change). By Cauchy’s theorem:
As and , the circular contributions vanish, leaving:
Hence .
Key Relationships
Section titled “Key Relationships”- Cauchy’s theorem requires analyticity on the entire region enclosed by the contour. If has even a single singularity inside , the integral may be nonzero.
- The integral over a closed contour equals times the sum of residues (a consequence of Cauchy’s theorem for multiply connected domains), connecting Cauchy’s theorem to the residue calculus.
- Path independence is equivalent to the existence of an antiderivative on a simply connected domain, which in turn is guaranteed by Cauchy’s theorem.
- Deformation of contours allows replacing complicated paths with simple ones (e.g., small circles around singularities) without changing the integral value.
- The Cauchy-Riemann equations are both necessary and sufficient for the proof: the vanishing of the double integral in the proof relies entirely on and .
Applications
Section titled “Applications”- Evaluating real integrals: Many difficult real integrals (e.g., ) are computed by choosing appropriate contours and applying Cauchy’s theorem.
- Computing residues: The residue theorem, which follows from Cauchy’s theorem, is the standard tool for evaluating contour integrals in physics and engineering.
- Conformal mapping: Cauchy’s theorem underpins the theory of conformal maps, used in fluid dynamics and electrostatics to solve boundary value problems.
- Signal processing: The Laplace and Fourier transforms rely on contour integration techniques derived from Cauchy’s theorem.
- Number theory: Contour integrals related to the Riemann zeta function use Cauchy’s theorem to establish properties of prime number distribution.