Skip to content

Cauchy's Theorem

Theorem 5.1 (Cauchy”s Theorem). If ff is analytic on a connected domain DD and γ\gamma Is a simple closed contour in DDThen

γf(z)dz=0\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = 0

Proof (for ff' continuous). By Green’s theorem in the plane, writing f=u+ivf = u + iv:

γfdz=γ(udxvdy)+iγ(vdx+udy)\int_\gamma f\, dz = \int_\gamma (u\, dx - v\, dy) + i\int_\gamma (v\, dx + u\, dy)

Applying Green’s theorem to each integral:

=D(vxuy)dA+iD(uxvy)dA=0= \iint_D (-v_x - u_y)\, dA + i\iint_D (u_x - v_y)\, dA = 0

By the Cauchy-Riemann equations. \blacksquare

A domain DCD \subseteq \mathbb{C} is ** connected** if every simple closed contour in DD can Be continuously shrunk to a point within DD.

Cauchy’s theorem may fail on multiply connected domains. For example, γ1zdz=2πi\int_\gamma \frac{1}{z}\, dz = 2\pi i where γ\gamma is the unit circle (traversing a region that Excludes the singularity at z=0z = 0).

Corollary 5.2. If ff is analytic on a connected domain DDThen the integral z0z1f(z)dz\int_{z_0}^{z_1} f(z)\, dz is independent of the path from z0z_0 to z1z_1 in DD.

Theorem 5.3. If ff is analytic on a connected domain DDThen ff has an antiderivative FF in DD (i.e., F(z)=f(z)F'(z) = f(z)), and

γf(z)dz=F(z1)F(z0)\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = F(z_1) - F(z_0)

Where z0z_0 and z1z_1 are the endpoints of γ\gamma.

5.5 Cauchy’s Theorem for Multiply Connected Domains

Section titled “5.5 Cauchy’s Theorem for Multiply Connected Domains”

Theorem 5.4. If ff is analytic on a domain DD containing simple closed contours γ,γ1,,γn\gamma, \gamma_1, \ldots, \gamma_n where γ1,,γn\gamma_1, \ldots, \gamma_n Lie in the interior of γ\gamma and the region between γ\gamma and the γk\gamma_k is contained in DD And all contours are positively oriented, then

γf(z)dz=k=1nγkf(z)dz\int_\gamma f(z)\, dz = \sum_{k=1}^n \int_{\gamma_k} f(z)\, dz

Theorem 5.5 (Deformation of Contours). If ff is analytic on a domain containing two simple Closed contours γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2 where one can be continuously deformed into the other Within the domain of analyticity of ffThen

γ1f(z)dz=γ2f(z)dz\int_{\gamma_1} f(z)\, dz = \int_{\gamma_2} f(z)\, dz

Proof. This follows directly from Theorem 5.4 applied to the region between γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2. \blacksquare

Remark. This theorem is enormously useful: we can replace a complicated contour with a simpler one (a small circle around each singularity) without changing the value of the integral.

Solution

Problem. Evaluate γdzz2\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z - 2} where γ\gamma is the ellipse x24+y29=1\frac{x^2}{4} + \frac{y^2}{9} = 1.

Since z=2z = 2 is inside the ellipse and 1z2\frac{1}{z - 2} is analytic everywhere else, By deformation of contours we can replace γ\gamma with a small circle around z=2z = 2:

γdzz2=2πi\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z - 2} = 2\pi i.

Problem. Evaluate γezzdz\int_\gamma \frac{e^z}{z}\, dz where γ\gamma is the square with vertices ±2±2i\pm 2 \pm 2i.

ezz\frac{e^z}{z} is analytic on and inside γ\gamma except at z=0z = 0. By deformation: γezzdz=z=rezzdz=2πie0=2πi\int_\gamma \frac{e^z}{z}\, dz = \int_{|z|=r} \frac{e^z}{z}\, dz = 2\pi i \cdot e^0 = 2\pi i.

Problem. Evaluate γdzz21\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z^2 - 1} where γ\gamma is z=2|z| = 2.

1z21=12(1z11z+1)\frac{1}{z^2 - 1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{z-1} - \frac{1}{z+1}\right).

Both z=±1z = \pm 1 are inside z=2|z| = 2.

γdzz21=12(2πi2πi)=0\int_\gamma \frac{dz}{z^2 - 1} = \frac{1}{2}(2\pi i - 2\pi i) = 0.

  • Assuming Cauchy’s theorem applies to any closed contour: The theorem requires ff to be analytic on a simply connected domain containing the contour. If the contour encloses any singularity, the integral may be non-zero.
  • Confusing simply connected with connected: A domain can be connected but not simply connected (e.g., an annulus). Cauchy’s theorem fails on such domains without additional conditions on the contour.
  • Applying the deformation theorem outside the domain of analyticity: The contour can only be deformed through regions where ff remains analytic. Deforming a contour across a singularity changes the value of the integral.
  • Forgetting orientation when using the multiply connected theorem: The outer contour and inner contours must be traversed with consistent positive orientation (counterclockwise for the outer, clockwise for the inner) for the equality γf=γkf\int_\gamma f = \sum \int_{\gamma_k} f to hold.

Problem. Evaluate I=02πdθ2+cosθI = \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\theta}{2 + \cos\theta}.

Solution. Let z=eiθz = e^{i\theta}, so dθ=dz/(iz)d\theta = dz/(iz) and cosθ=(z+z1)/2\cos\theta = (z + z^{-1})/2.

I=z=112+(z+z1)/2dziz=z=124z+z2+1dzi=2iz=1dzz2+4z+1I = \oint_{|z|=1} \frac{1}{2 + (z + z^{-1})/2} \cdot \frac{dz}{iz} = \oint_{|z|=1} \frac{2}{4z + z^2 + 1} \cdot \frac{dz}{i} = \frac{2}{i} \oint_{|z|=1} \frac{dz}{z^2 + 4z + 1}

The denominator factors as (z+23)(z+2+3)(z + 2 - \sqrt{3})(z + 2 + \sqrt{3}). Only the root z=2+3z = -2 + \sqrt{3} lies inside z=1|z| = 1. By Cauchy’s theorem applied to the simply connected region after deformation:

I=2i2πiResz=2+31z2+4z+1=4π123=2π3I = \frac{2}{i} \cdot 2\pi i \cdot \operatorname{Res}_{z=-2+\sqrt{3}} \frac{1}{z^2 + 4z + 1} = 4\pi \cdot \frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}} = \frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{3}}

Problem. Evaluate 0xx2+1dx\int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^2 + 1}\,dx.

Solution. Consider f(z)=zz2+1f(z) = \frac{\sqrt{z}}{z^2 + 1} with a branch cut along the positive real axis. Integrate around a keyhole contour γ\gamma consisting of CRC_R (large circle radius RR), CεC_\varepsilon (small circle radius ε\varepsilon), and two straight segments just above and below the cut. On the upper segment, z=x\sqrt{z} = \sqrt{x}; on the lower segment, z=x\sqrt{z} = -\sqrt{x} (due to the 2π2\pi phase change). By Cauchy’s theorem:

γf(z)dz=2πi(Resz=if(z)+Resz=if(z))\int_\gamma f(z)\,dz = 2\pi i \left(\operatorname{Res}_{z=i} f(z) + \operatorname{Res}_{z=-i} f(z)\right)

As RR \to \infty and ε0\varepsilon \to 0, the circular contributions vanish, leaving:

20xx2+1dx=2πi(i2i+i2i)=π22\int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^2 + 1}\,dx = 2\pi i \left(\frac{\sqrt{i}}{2i} + \frac{\sqrt{-i}}{-2i}\right) = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}}

Hence 0xx2+1dx=π2\int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{x}}{x^2 + 1}\,dx = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}}.

  • Cauchy’s theorem requires analyticity on the entire region enclosed by the contour. If ff has even a single singularity inside γ\gamma, the integral may be nonzero.
  • The integral over a closed contour equals 2πi2\pi i times the sum of residues (a consequence of Cauchy’s theorem for multiply connected domains), connecting Cauchy’s theorem to the residue calculus.
  • Path independence is equivalent to the existence of an antiderivative on a simply connected domain, which in turn is guaranteed by Cauchy’s theorem.
  • Deformation of contours allows replacing complicated paths with simple ones (e.g., small circles around singularities) without changing the integral value.
  • The Cauchy-Riemann equations are both necessary and sufficient for the proof: the vanishing of the double integral in the proof relies entirely on ux=vyu_x = v_y and uy=vxu_y = -v_x.
  • Evaluating real integrals: Many difficult real integrals (e.g., 0cosxx2+1dx\int_0^\infty \frac{\cos x}{x^2+1}\,dx) are computed by choosing appropriate contours and applying Cauchy’s theorem.
  • Computing residues: The residue theorem, which follows from Cauchy’s theorem, is the standard tool for evaluating contour integrals in physics and engineering.
  • Conformal mapping: Cauchy’s theorem underpins the theory of conformal maps, used in fluid dynamics and electrostatics to solve boundary value problems.
  • Signal processing: The Laplace and Fourier transforms rely on contour integration techniques derived from Cauchy’s theorem.
  • Number theory: Contour integrals related to the Riemann zeta function use Cauchy’s theorem to establish properties of prime number distribution.