The limit limz→z0f(z)=L means: for every ε>0There exists δ>0 Such that 0<∣z−z0∣<δ implies ∣f(z)−L∣<ε.
Unlike the real case, z can approach z0 from any direction in C. This makes limits More restrictive.
Proposition 2.1.limz→z0f(z)=L if and only if lim(x,y)→(x0,y0)u(x,y)=a And lim(x,y)→(x0,y0)v(x,y)=b where L=a+bi.
Definition.f is continuous at z0 if limz→z0f(z)=f(z0).
Solution
Problem. Show that limz→0zzˉ does not exist.
Let z=reiθ. Then zzˉ=e−2iθ. As z→0 along different Rays (θ=0,π/2,π/4Etc.), the ratio takes different values (1,−1,−iEtc.). Since the limit depends on the direction of approach, it does not exist.
Problem. Determine whether f(z)=z−1z2−1 is continuous at z=1.
For z=1: f(z)=z+1. The limit as z→1 is 2But f(1) is undefined (division by zero). If we define f(1)=2Then f becomes continuous at z=1.
Remark. The requirement that the limit be the same for all directions of approach of h is what Makes complex differentiability far more restrictive than real differentiability.
Definition. A function f is analytic (or holomorphic) on an open set U⊆C if f is differentiable at every point of U. A function that is analytic On all of C is called entire.
Examples of entire functions:zn, ez, sinz, coszPolynomials.
Example of a non-analytic function:f(z)=zˉ is nowhere differentiable (except at z=0 if we define it, but still not analytic there).
Solution
Problem. Show that f(z)=∣z∣2 is differentiable only at z=0.
f(z)=x2+y2So u=x2+y2 and v=0. ux=2x, uy=2y, vx=0, vy=0. The Cauchy-Riemann equations require 2x=0 and 2y=0So x=y=0. Thus f satisfies CR only at z=0.
At z=0: f′(0)=limh→0h∣h∣2=limh→0hˉ=0So f is Differentiable at 0 but not analytic anywhere (no neighbourhood of 0 is analytic).
Problem. Show that f(z)=zzˉ+z is differentiable only at z=0.
f(z)=∣z∣2+z=(x2+y2+x)+iy. ux=2x+1, uy=2y, vx=0, vy=1. CR equations: 2x+1=1⇒x=0And 2y=0⇒y=0. At (0,0): f′(0)=limh→0hhhˉ+h=limh→0(hˉ+1)=1. So f is differentiable at z=0 only, hence nowhere analytic.