Skip to content

Sequences and Series of Functions

Let (fn)(f_n) be a sequence of functions defined on a set E⊆RE \subseteq \mathbb{R}.

Definition. (fn)(f_n) converges pointwise to ff on EE if for every x∈Ex \in E and every ε>0\varepsilon > 0There exists N∈NN \in \mathbb{N} (depending on both xx and ε\varepsilon) such that ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<ε|f_n(x) - f(x)| \lt \varepsilon for all n≥Nn \geq N.

Example. Let fn(x)=xnf_n(x) = x^n on E=[0,1]E = [0, 1]. For each x∈[0,1)x \in [0, 1), fn(x)=xn→0f_n(x) = x^n \to 0And fn(1)=1f_n(1) = 1 for all nn. So fnf_n converges pointwise to

f(x)={0if 0≤x<11if x=1f(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & \mathrm{if\ } 0 \leq x \lt 1 \\ 1 & \mathrm{if\ } x = 1 \end{cases}

Note that each fnf_n is continuous, but the pointwise limit ff is not continuous at x=1x = 1.

Definition. (fn)(f_n) converges uniformly to ff on EE if for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0There Exists N∈NN \in \mathbb{N} (depending only on ε\varepsilonNot on xx) such that for all x∈Ex \in E:

∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<εfor all n≥N|f_n(x) - f(x)| \lt \varepsilon \quad \mathrm{for\ all\ } n \geq N

Equivalently, sup⁡x∈E∣fn(x)−f(x)∣→0\sup_{x \in E} |f_n(x) - f(x)| \to 0 as n→∞n \to \infty.

Proposition 7.1. Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. The converse is false.

Example (continued). fn(x)=xnf_n(x) = x^n on [0,1][0, 1] converges pointwise but not uniformly. We have sup⁡x∈[0,1]∣fn(x)−f(x)∣=sup⁡x∈[0,1)xn=1\sup_{x \in [0,1]} |f_n(x) - f(x)| = \sup_{x \in [0,1)} x^n = 1 for all nn (since the supremum is Approached as x→1−x \to 1^-). This does not tend to 00.

However, on [0,r][0, r] for any r<1r \lt 1: sup⁡x∈[0,r]∣xn∣=rn→0\sup_{x \in [0,r]} |x^n| = r^n \to 0So the convergence Is uniform on [0,r][0, r].

Theorem 7.1 (Weierstrass M-Test). Let (fn)(f_n) be a sequence of functions on EE. If there exists a Sequence (Mn)(M_n) of non-negative real numbers such that ∣fn(x)∣≤Mn|f_n(x)| \leq M_n for all x∈Ex \in E and all nnAnd ∑n=1∞Mn<∞\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} M_n \lt \inftyThen ∑n=1∞fn\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n converges uniformly on EE.

Proof. Let Sn(x)=∑k=1nfk(x)S_n(x) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) and Tn=∑k=1nMkT_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n} M_k. Since ∑Mk\sum M_k converges, (Tn)(T_n) is a Cauchy sequence. Given ε>0\varepsilon > 0There exists NN such that for m>n≥Nm > n \geq N:

Tm−Tn=∑k=n+1mMk<εT_m - T_n = \sum_{k=n+1}^{m} M_k \lt \varepsilon

Then for all x∈Ex \in E and m>n≥Nm > n \geq N:

∣Sm(x)−Sn(x)∣=∣∑k=n+1mfk(x)∣≤∑k=n+1m∣fk(x)∣≤∑k=n+1mMk<ε|S_m(x) - S_n(x)| = \left|\sum_{k=n+1}^{m} f_k(x)\right| \leq \sum_{k=n+1}^{m} |f_k(x)| \leq \sum_{k=n+1}^{m} M_k \lt \varepsilon

So the partial sums (Sn)(S_n) satisfy the uniform Cauchy criterion on EEHence converge uniformly. ■\blacksquare

Theorem 7.2. If (fn)(f_n) is a sequence of continuous functions on EE converging uniformly to ff On EEThen ff is continuous on EE.

Proof. Let c∈Ec \in E and ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Since fn→ff_n \to f uniformly, choose NN such that ∣fN(x)−f(x)∣<ε/3|f_N(x) - f(x)| \lt \varepsilon/3 for all x∈Ex \in E. Since fNf_N is continuous at ccChoose δ>0\delta > 0 such that ∣x−c∣<δ|x - c| \lt \delta implies ∣fN(x)−fN(c)∣<ε/3|f_N(x) - f_N(c)| \lt \varepsilon/3. Then:

∣f(x)−f(c)∣≤∣f(x)−fN(x)∣+∣fN(x)−fN(c)∣+∣fN(c)−f(c)∣<ε3+ε3+ε3=ε|f(x) - f(c)| \leq |f(x) - f_N(x)| + |f_N(x) - f_N(c)| + |f_N(c) - f(c)| \lt \frac{\varepsilon}{3} + \frac{\varepsilon}{3} + \frac{\varepsilon}{3} = \varepsilon

■\blacksquare

Theorem 7.3. If (fn)(f_n) is a sequence of Riemann integrable functions on [a,b][a, b] converging Uniformly to ff on [a,b][a, b]Then ff is Riemann integrable and

lim⁡n→∞∫abfn(x) dx=∫abf(x) dx\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_a^b f_n(x)\, dx = \int_a^b f(x)\, dx

Proof. Since (fn)(f_n) converges uniformly, ff is the uniform limit of integrable functions. Given ε>0\varepsilon > 0Choose NN with sup⁡∣fN(x)−f(x)∣<ε/(2(b−a))\sup |f_N(x) - f(x)| \lt \varepsilon/(2(b-a)) for all x∈[a,b]x \in [a, b]. Then fN−ε/(2(b−a))≤f(x)≤fN(x)+ε/(2(b−a))f_N - \varepsilon/(2(b-a)) \leq f(x) \leq f_N(x) + \varepsilon/(2(b-a)) for all xxAnd by Integrability of fNf_N:

∫abfN−ε2≤∫ab‾f≤∫ab‾f≤∫abfN+ε2\int_a^b f_N - \frac{\varepsilon}{2} \leq \underline{\int_a^b} f \leq \overline{\int_a^b} f \leq \int_a^b f_N + \frac{\varepsilon}{2}

So ∫‾f−∫‾f≤ε\overline{\int} f - \underline{\int} f \leq \varepsilonProving ff is integrable. For the limit:

∣∫abfn−∫abf∣≤∫ab∣fn−f∣≤(b−a)⋅sup⁡[a,b]∣fn−f∣→0\left|\int_a^b f_n - \int_a^b f\right| \leq \int_a^b |f_n - f| \leq (b-a) \cdot \sup_{[a,b]} |f_n - f| \to 0

■\blacksquare

7.6 Uniform Convergence and Differentiation

Section titled “7.6 Uniform Convergence and Differentiation”

Uniform convergence of functions does not guarantee convergence of derivatives. A stronger Hypothesis is needed.

Theorem 7.4. Suppose (fn)(f_n) is a sequence of differentiable functions on [a,b][a, b] such that:

  1. (fn(c))(f_n(c)) converges for some c∈[a,b]c \in [a, b]
  2. (fn")(f_n") converges uniformly on [a,b][a, b]

Then (fn)(f_n) converges uniformly to a differentiable function ff on [a,b][a, b]And f′(x)=lim⁡n→∞fn′(x)f'(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n'(x).

Proof. Let g=lim⁡fn′g = \lim f_n' (uniform limit). Define f(x)=lim⁡n→∞[fn(c)+∫cxfn′(t) dt]f(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \left[f_n(c) + \int_c^x f_n'(t)\, dt\right]. By Theorem 7.3, ∫cxfn′(t) dt→∫cxg(t) dt\int_c^x f_n'(t)\, dt \to \int_c^x g(t)\, dtSo f(x)=f(c)+∫cxg(t) dtf(x) = f(c) + \int_c^x g(t)\, dt. By FTC Part 1, ff is differentiable and f′(x)=g(x)f'(x) = g(x). Uniform convergence of fnf_n to ff follows From the estimate ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣≤∣fn(c)−f(c)∣+∫ab∣fn′(t)−g(t)∣ dt|f_n(x) - f(x)| \leq |f_n(c) - f(c)| + \int_a^b |f_n'(t) - g(t)|\, dt. ■\blacksquare

A power series centered at aa is a series of the form ∑n=0∞cn(x−a)n\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n (x - a)^n.

Theorem 7.5 (Radius of Convergence). Every power series ∑cn(x−a)n\sum c_n (x - a)^n has a radius of Convergence R∈[0,∞]R \in [0, \infty] such that:

  • The series converges absolutely for ∣x−a∣<R|x - a| \lt R
  • The series diverges for ∣x−a∣>R|x - a| > R
  • The behavior at ∣x−a∣=R|x - a| = R must be checked separately

The radius is given by 1/R=lim sup⁡n→∞∣cn∣n1/R = \limsup_{n \to \infty} \sqrt[n]{|c_n|} (Cauchy-Hadamard formula), or When the limit exists, R=lim⁡n→∞∣cn/cn+1∣R = \lim_{n \to \infty} |c_n/c_{n+1}|.

Proof. Apply the root test to ∑∣cn(x−a)n∣\sum |c_n (x-a)^n|: lim sup⁡∣cn∣n∣x−a∣=∣x−a∣/R\limsup \sqrt[n]{|c_n|} |x-a| = |x-a|/R (where 1/R=lim sup⁡∣cn∣n1/R = \limsup \sqrt[n]{|c_n|}). The root test gives convergence when ∣x−a∣/R<1|x-a|/R \lt 1 And divergence when ∣x−a∣/R>1|x-a|/R > 1. ■\blacksquare

Theorem 7.6. A power series converges uniformly on every compact subset of its open disk of Convergence.

Theorem 7.6a (Differentiation and Integration of Power Series). If f(x)=∑n=0∞cn(x−a)nf(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n (x-a)^n Has radius of convergence R>0R > 0Then:

  1. ff is differentiable on (a−R,a+R)(a - R, a + R) and f′(x)=∑n=1∞ncn(x−a)n−1f'(x) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n c_n (x - a)^{n-1} (same RR).
  2. ff is infinitely differentiable on (a−R,a+R)(a - R, a + R)And f(k)(x)=∑n=k∞n!(n−k)!cn(x−a)n−kf^{(k)}(x) = \sum_{n=k}^{\infty} \frac{n!}{(n-k)!} c_n (x - a)^{n-k}.
  3. ∫axf(t) dt=∑n=0∞cnn+1(x−a)n+1\int_a^x f(t)\, dt = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{c_n}{n+1}(x - a)^{n+1} for ∣x−a∣<R|x - a| \lt R.
  4. cn=f(n)(a)/n!c_n = f^{(n)}(a)/n! (uniqueness of power series coefficients).

Proof. The differentiated series ∑ncn(x−a)n−1\sum n c_n (x-a)^{n-1} has the same radius of convergence as The original (by the Cauchy-Hadamard formula, since nn→1\sqrt[n]{n} \to 1). By Theorem 7.4, the Derivative of the sum equals the sum of the derivatives. Parts (2), (3), and (4) follow by Induction and the FTC. ■\blacksquare

Theorem 7.6b (Abel’s Theorem). If ∑n=0∞cn\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n converges to LLThen

lim⁡x→1−∑n=0∞cnxn=L\lim_{x \to 1^-} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^n = L

That is, the power series is continuous from the left at the endpoint x=1x = 1.

Proof (sketch). Let sn=∑k=0ncks_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} c_k and sn→Ls_n \to L. Write the partial sum ∑k=0nckxk=∑k=0n(sk−sk−1)xk\sum_{k=0}^{n} c_k x^k = \sum_{k=0}^{n}(s_k - s_{k-1})x^k (with s−1=0s_{-1} = 0) and use summation by Parts to express this as snxn+∑k=0n−1sk(xk−xk+1)s_n x^n + \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} s_k(x^k - x^{k+1}). Letting n→∞n \to \infty and using That sn→Ls_n \to L and xn→0x^n \to 0 for ∣x∣<1|x| \lt 1One shows the expression tends to LL as x→1−x \to 1^-. ■\blacksquare

Example. Since ∑k=1∞(−1)k+1/k=ln⁡2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{k+1}/k = \ln 2Abel’s theorem gives lim⁡x→1−∑k=1∞(−1)k+1xk/k=ln⁡2\lim_{x \to 1^-} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{k+1} x^k/k = \ln 2I.e., ln⁡2\ln 2 is the left-hand limit Of −ln⁡(1−x)-\ln(1 - x) at x=1x = 1.

The Taylor series of ff at aa is ∑n=0∞f(n)(a)n!(x−a)n\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}(x - a)^n.

Definition. A function ff is analytic at aa if its Taylor series at aa converges to f(x)f(x) In some neighborhood of aa.

Not every C∞C^{\infty} function is analytic. The standard counterexample is:

f(x)={e−1/x2x≠00x=0f(x) = \begin{cases} e^{-1/x^2} & x \neq 0 \\ 0 & x = 0 \end{cases}

f(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}(0) = 0 for all nnSo the Taylor series at 00 is identically zero, which Converges only to 00Not to f(x)f(x) for x≠0x \neq 0.

Worked Example: Show $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n^2}$ converges uniformly on $[-1, 1]$

Solution. For x∈[−1,1]x \in [-1, 1]: ∣xnn2∣≤1n2\left|\frac{x^n}{n^2}\right| \leq \frac{1}{n^2}. Since ∑n=1∞1n2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} converges (it is a pp-series with p=2>1p = 2 > 1), the Weierstrass M-Test with Mn=1/n2M_n = 1/n^2 implies the series converges uniformly on [−1,1][-1, 1]. ■\blacksquare

Worked Example: Find the radius of convergence of $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!}$

Solution. Apply the ratio test to the coefficients: lim⁡n→∞∣cn+1cn∣=lim⁡n→∞n!(n+1)!=lim⁡n→∞1n+1=0\lim_{n \to \infty} \left|\frac{c_{n+1}}{c_n}\right| = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n!}{(n+1)!} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n+1} = 0.

So R=∞R = \infty and the series converges for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}. This is the power series for exe^x. By Theorem 7.4, the derivative of the sum equals ∑n=1∞nxn−1n!=∑n=1∞xn−1(n−1)!=∑k=0∞xkk!=ex\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n x^{n-1}}{n!} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^{n-1}}{(n-1)!} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^k}{k!} = e^x, confirming That exe^x is its own derivative. ■\blacksquare

Worked Example: Find the radius of convergence of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n! \, x^n$

Solution. Apply the ratio test to the coefficients:

lim⁡n→∞∣cn+1cn∣=lim⁡n→∞(n+1)!n!=lim⁡n→∞(n+1)=∞\lim_{n \to \infty} \left|\frac{c_{n+1}}{c_n}\right| = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{(n+1)!}{n!} = \lim_{n \to \infty} (n+1) = \infty

So R=0R = 0Meaning the series converges only at x=0x = 0. ■\blacksquare

Worked Example: Show $f_n(x) = \frac{x}{1 + nx}$ converges uniformly on $[1, \infty)$

Solution. Pointwise limit: For x≥1x \geq 1: lim⁡n→∞x1+nx=lim⁡n→∞11/x+n=0\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{x}{1 + nx} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{1/x + n} = 0.

Uniform convergence: sup⁡x∈[1,∞)∣x1+nx−0∣=sup⁡x≥1x1+nx\sup_{x \in [1, \infty)} \left|\frac{x}{1 + nx} - 0\right| = \sup_{x \geq 1} \frac{x}{1 + nx}. To find the maximum, differentiate with respect to xx: ddx(x1+nx)=1(1+nx)2>0\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{x}{1+nx}\right) = \frac{1}{(1+nx)^2} > 0. So the function is increasing in xx on [1,∞)[1, \infty)And:

sup⁡x≥1x1+nx=lim⁡x→∞x1+nx=1n\sup_{x \geq 1} \frac{x}{1 + nx} = \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{x}{1 + nx} = \frac{1}{n}

Since sup⁡∣fn∣=1/n→0\sup |f_n| = 1/n \to 0The convergence is uniform on [1,∞)[1, \infty). ■\blacksquare

:::caution Common Pitfall Pointwise convergence does not preserve continuity, differentiability, or integrability. Uniform Convergence preserves continuity and allows interchange of limit and integral, but not limit and Derivative. For derivatives, uniform convergence of the sequence of derivatives (not the original Sequence) is required, as stated in Theorem 7.4. Also, the Weierstrass M-Test applies only to series Of functions, not sequences; for sequences, one must verify the uniform Cauchy criterion directly.

:::