Let (fn) be a sequence of functions defined on a set E⊆R.
Definition.(fn)converges pointwise to f on E if for every x∈E and every ε>0There exists N∈N (depending on both x and ε) such that ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<ε for all n≥N.
Example. Let fn(x)=xn on E=[0,1]. For each x∈[0,1), fn(x)=xn→0And fn(1)=1 for all n. So fn converges pointwise to
f(x)={01if0≤x<1ifx=1
Note that each fn is continuous, but the pointwise limit f is not continuous at x=1.
7.2 Uniform Convergence
Definition.(fn)converges uniformly to f on E if for every ε>0There Exists N∈N (depending only on εNot on x) such that for all x∈E:
∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<εforalln≥N
Equivalently, supx∈E∣fn(x)−f(x)∣→0 as n→∞.
Proposition 7.1. Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. The converse is false.
Example (continued).fn(x)=xn on [0,1] converges pointwise but not uniformly. We have supx∈[0,1]∣fn(x)−f(x)∣=supx∈[0,1)xn=1 for all n (since the supremum is Approached as x→1−). This does not tend to 0.
However, on [0,r] for any r<1: supx∈[0,r]∣xn∣=rn→0So the convergence Is uniform on [0,r].
7.3 The Weierstrass M-Test
Theorem 7.1 (Weierstrass M-Test). Let (fn) be a sequence of functions on E. If there exists a Sequence (Mn) of non-negative real numbers such that ∣fn(x)∣≤Mn for all x∈E and all nAnd ∑n=1∞Mn<∞Then ∑n=1∞fn converges uniformly on E.
Proof. Let Sn(x)=∑k=1nfk(x) and Tn=∑k=1nMk. Since ∑Mk converges, (Tn) is a Cauchy sequence. Given ε>0There exists N such that for m>n≥N:
So the partial sums (Sn) satisfy the uniform Cauchy criterion on EHence converge uniformly. ■
7.4 Uniform Convergence and Continuity
Theorem 7.2. If (fn) is a sequence of continuous functions on E converging uniformly to f On EThen f is continuous on E.
Proof. Let c∈E and ε>0. Since fn→f uniformly, choose N such that ∣fN(x)−f(x)∣<ε/3 for all x∈E. Since fN is continuous at cChoose δ>0 such that ∣x−c∣<δ implies ∣fN(x)−fN(c)∣<ε/3. Then:
Theorem 7.3. If (fn) is a sequence of Riemann integrable functions on [a,b] converging Uniformly to f on [a,b]Then f is Riemann integrable and
limn→∞∫abfn(x)dx=∫abf(x)dx
Proof. Since (fn) converges uniformly, f is the uniform limit of integrable functions. Given ε>0Choose N with sup∣fN(x)−f(x)∣<ε/(2(b−a)) for all x∈[a,b]. Then fN−ε/(2(b−a))≤f(x)≤fN(x)+ε/(2(b−a)) for all xAnd by Integrability of fN:
∫abfN−2ε≤∫abf≤∫abf≤∫abfN+2ε
So ∫f−∫f≤εProving f is integrable. For the limit:
Uniform convergence of functions does not guarantee convergence of derivatives. A stronger Hypothesis is needed.
Theorem 7.4. Suppose (fn) is a sequence of differentiable functions on [a,b] such that:
(fn(c)) converges for some c∈[a,b]
(fn") converges uniformly on [a,b]
Then (fn) converges uniformly to a differentiable function f on [a,b]And f′(x)=limn→∞fn′(x).
Proof. Let g=limfn′ (uniform limit). Define f(x)=limn→∞[fn(c)+∫cxfn′(t)dt]. By Theorem 7.3, ∫cxfn′(t)dt→∫cxg(t)dtSo f(x)=f(c)+∫cxg(t)dt. By FTC Part 1, f is differentiable and f′(x)=g(x). Uniform convergence of fn to f follows From the estimate ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣≤∣fn(c)−f(c)∣+∫ab∣fn′(t)−g(t)∣dt. ■
7.7 Power Series
A power series centered at a is a series of the form ∑n=0∞cn(x−a)n.
Theorem 7.5 (Radius of Convergence). Every power series ∑cn(x−a)n has a radius of ConvergenceR∈[0,∞] such that:
The series converges absolutely for ∣x−a∣<R
The series diverges for ∣x−a∣>R
The behavior at ∣x−a∣=R must be checked separately
The radius is given by 1/R=limsupn→∞n∣cn∣ (Cauchy-Hadamard formula), or When the limit exists, R=limn→∞∣cn/cn+1∣.
Proof. Apply the root test to ∑∣cn(x−a)n∣: limsupn∣cn∣∣x−a∣=∣x−a∣/R (where 1/R=limsupn∣cn∣). The root test gives convergence when ∣x−a∣/R<1 And divergence when ∣x−a∣/R>1. ■
Theorem 7.6. A power series converges uniformly on every compact subset of its open disk of Convergence.
Theorem 7.6a (Differentiation and Integration of Power Series). If f(x)=∑n=0∞cn(x−a)n Has radius of convergence R>0Then:
f is differentiable on (a−R,a+R) and f′(x)=∑n=1∞ncn(x−a)n−1 (same R).
f is infinitely differentiable on (a−R,a+R)And f(k)(x)=∑n=k∞(n−k)!n!cn(x−a)n−k.
∫axf(t)dt=∑n=0∞n+1cn(x−a)n+1 for ∣x−a∣<R.
cn=f(n)(a)/n! (uniqueness of power series coefficients).
Proof. The differentiated series ∑ncn(x−a)n−1 has the same radius of convergence as The original (by the Cauchy-Hadamard formula, since nn→1). By Theorem 7.4, the Derivative of the sum equals the sum of the derivatives. Parts (2), (3), and (4) follow by Induction and the FTC. ■
Theorem 7.6b (Abel’s Theorem). If ∑n=0∞cn converges to LThen
limx→1−∑n=0∞cnxn=L
That is, the power series is continuous from the left at the endpoint x=1.
Proof (sketch). Let sn=∑k=0nck and sn→L. Write the partial sum ∑k=0nckxk=∑k=0n(sk−sk−1)xk (with s−1=0) and use summation by Parts to express this as snxn+∑k=0n−1sk(xk−xk+1). Letting n→∞ and using That sn→L and xn→0 for ∣x∣<1One shows the expression tends to L as x→1−. ■
Example. Since ∑k=1∞(−1)k+1/k=ln2Abel’s theorem gives limx→1−∑k=1∞(−1)k+1xk/k=ln2I.e., ln2 is the left-hand limit Of −ln(1−x) at x=1.
7.8 Taylor Series Convergence
The Taylor series of f at a is ∑n=0∞n!f(n)(a)(x−a)n.
Definition. A function f is analytic at a if its Taylor series at a converges to f(x) In some neighborhood of a.
Not every C∞ function is analytic. The standard counterexample is:
f(x)={e−1/x20x=0x=0
f(n)(0)=0 for all nSo the Taylor series at 0 is identically zero, which Converges only to 0Not to f(x) for x=0.
7.9 Worked Examples
Worked Example: Show $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n^2}$ converges uniformly on $[-1, 1]$
Solution. For x∈[−1,1]: n2xn≤n21. Since ∑n=1∞n21 converges (it is a p-series with p=2>1), the Weierstrass M-Test with Mn=1/n2 implies the series converges uniformly on [−1,1]. ■
Worked Example: Find the radius of convergence of $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!}$
Solution. Apply the ratio test to the coefficients: limn→∞cncn+1=limn→∞(n+1)!n!=limn→∞n+11=0.
So R=∞ and the series converges for all x∈R. This is the power series for ex. By Theorem 7.4, the derivative of the sum equals ∑n=1∞n!nxn−1=∑n=1∞(n−1)!xn−1=∑k=0∞k!xk=ex, confirming That ex is its own derivative. ■
Worked Example: Find the radius of convergence of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n! \, x^n$
Solution. Apply the ratio test to the coefficients:
Worked Example: Show $f_n(x) = \frac{x}{1 + nx}$ converges uniformly on $[1, \infty)$
Solution.Pointwise limit: For x≥1: limn→∞1+nxx=limn→∞1/x+n1=0.
Uniform convergence:supx∈[1,∞)1+nxx−0=supx≥11+nxx. To find the maximum, differentiate with respect to x: dxd(1+nxx)=(1+nx)21>0. So the function is increasing in x on [1,∞)And:
supx≥11+nxx=limx→∞1+nxx=n1
Since sup∣fn∣=1/n→0The convergence is uniform on [1,∞). ■
:::caution Common Pitfall Pointwise convergence does not preserve continuity, differentiability, or integrability. Uniform Convergence preserves continuity and allows interchange of limit and integral, but not limit and Derivative. For derivatives, uniform convergence of the sequence of derivatives (not the original Sequence) is required, as stated in Theorem 7.4. Also, the Weierstrass M-Test applies only to series Of functions, not sequences; for sequences, one must verify the uniform Cauchy criterion directly.