A series∑n=1∞an converges if the sequence of partial sums SN=∑n=1Nan Converges. The limit is the sum of the series.
If an≥0 for all nThe series of partial sums is increasing, so by the monotone convergence Theorem, ∑an converges if and only if (SN) is bounded above.
3.2 Convergence Tests
Theorem 3.1 (Comparison Test). If 0≤an≤bn for all nThen:
If ∑bn converges, then ∑an converges.
If ∑an diverges, then ∑bn diverges.
Theorem 3.2 (Limit Comparison Test). If an>0, bn>0And limn→∞an/bn=L where 0<L<∞Then ∑an converges if and only if ∑bn converges.
Theorem 3.3 (Ratio Test). If limn→∞∣an+1/an∣=LThen:
If L<1, ∑an converges absolutely.
If L>1, ∑an diverges.
If L=1The test is inconclusive.
Theorem 3.4 (Root Test). If limsupn→∞n∣an∣=LThen:
If L<1, ∑an converges absolutely.
If L>1, ∑an diverges.
If L=1The test is inconclusive.
Proof. If L<1Choose r with L<r<1. By definition of limsupThere exists N such that n∣an∣<r for all n≥NI.e., ∣an∣<rn. Since ∑rn converges (geometric series with r<1), the comparison test gives absolute convergence.
If L>1Then for infinitely many n: n∣an∣>1So ∣an∣>1. Hence an→0 And the series diverges. ■
Theorem 3.5 (Integral Test). If f:[1,∞)→[0,∞) is positive, continuous, and Decreasing, then ∑n=1∞f(n) converges if and only if ∫1∞f(x)dx converges.
Proof. Since f is decreasing, for k≤x≤k+1: f(k+1)≤f(x)≤f(k). Integrating:
If ∫1∞f converges, the left inequality shows ∑f(k) is bounded above, hence converges. If ∫1∞f diverges, the right inequality shows ∑f(k) is unbounded, hence diverges. ■
Theorem 3.6 (Alternating Series Test). If an>0, an decreases, and an→0Then ∑n=1∞(−1)n+1an converges.
Proof. The partial sums of the even-indexed subsequence satisfy S2n=S2n−2−a2n−1+a2n. Since a2n−1≥a2nWe have S2n≤S2n−2So (S2n) is decreasing. Similarly, (S2n+1) is increasing. Also S2n+1=S2n+a2n+1≥S2n. Both sequences are bounded (since (S2n) is decreasing and bounded below by S1And (S2n+1) is increasing and bounded Above by S2). Hence both converge. Since a2n+1→0Their limits coincide. ■
3.3 Absolute and Conditional Convergence
A series ∑anconverges absolutely if ∑∣an∣ converges. It converges conditionally If ∑an converges but ∑∣an∣ diverges.
Theorem 3.7. If ∑an converges absolutely, then ∑an converges.
Proof. Since ∑∣an∣ converges, the partial sums of ∑∣an∣ satisfy the Cauchy criterion. Given ε>0There exists N such that for m>n≥N: ∑k=n+1m∣ak∣<ε. Then ∑k=n+1mak≤∑k=n+1m∣ak∣<εSo ∑an satisfies The Cauchy criterion and converges. ■
3.4 The Alternating Series Estimation Theorem
Theorem 3.8 (Alternating Series Estimation). If S=∑n=1∞(−1)n+1an satisfies the Hypotheses of the alternating series test, then the error after N terms satisfies:
∣S−SN∣≤aN+1
Proof. We have S2n≤S≤S2n+1=S2n+a2n+1 and S2n−1≥S≥S2n=S2n−1−a2n. In both cases ∣S−SN∣≤aN+1. ■
3.5 Cauchy Condensation Test
Theorem 3.8b (Cauchy Condensation Test). If (an) is a non-negative, decreasing sequence, then ∑n=1∞an converges if and only if ∑k=0∞2ka2k converges.
Proof. Group the terms of ∑an. For the lower bound, note:
If ∑2ka2k converges, the upper bound shows ∑an converges. If ∑an Converges, the lower bound shows ∑2ka2k converges. ■
Corollary.∑n=1∞1/np converges if and only if p>1. Apply the condensation Test: ∑2k⋅1/(2k)p=∑2k(1−p)A geometric series with ratio 21−p Which converges iff 1−p<0I.e., p>1.
3.6 Rearrangement of Series
Theorem 3.9 (Riemann Rearrangement Theorem). If ∑an converges conditionally, then for any L∈R (or ±∞), there exists a rearrangement σ:N→N such That ∑n=1∞aσ(n)=L.
Proof (outline). Let P={n:an>0} and N={n:an<0}. Since ∑an converges Conditionally, both ∑n∈Pan=+∞ and ∑n∈Nan=−∞.
To achieve sum L∈R: take positive terms in order until the partial sum exceeds L Then take negative terms until it falls below LThen positive terms again, and so on. Since both The positive and negative subseries diverge, this process can always continue. The terms tend to Zero (since the series converges), so the oscillations around L shrink to zero. ■
Remark. By contrast, every rearrangement of an absolutely convergent series converges to the same sum.
The integral diverges, so by the integral test, the series diverges. ■
Worked Example: Approximate $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}$ to within $0.01$
Solution. This is the alternating harmonic series, with an=1/n. By the alternating series Estimation theorem, ∣S−SN∣≤aN+1=1/(N+1). We need 1/(N+1)≤0.01So N+1≥100I.e., N≥99.
So S99=∑n=199n(−1)n+1 approximates ln2 to within 0.01. (The exact sum is ln2≈0.6931.) ■
Worked Example: Determine convergence of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2 + 1}$
Solution. Since n2+11≤n21 for all nAnd ∑1/n2 converges (p-series with p=2>1), the comparison test implies ∑n2+11 converges. ■
Worked Example: Use the condensation test for $\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n (\ln n) (\ln \ln n)}$
Solution. Let an=n(lnn)(lnlnn)1 for n≥3. This is positive and decreasing. By the condensation test, ∑an converges iff ∑2ka2k converges. Compute:
2ka2k=2k⋅kln2⋅ln(kln2)2k=kln2⋅ln(kln2)1≈klnk1
The series ∑klnk1 diverges (integral test, analogous to ∑nlnn1). Therefore ∑an diverges. ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Section 3.5 (Cauchy Condensation Test).
:::caution Common Pitfall The ratio and root tests are inconclusive when the limit equals 1. In such cases, try the comparison Test, integral test, or other methods. For example, ∑1/n diverges (harmonic series) and ∑1/n2 converges, but both give a ratio test limit of 1.