Skip to content

Radon-Nikodym Derivative and Lebesgue Decomposition

A measure ν\nu is absolutely continuous with respect to μ\mu (written ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu) if μ(A)=0\mu(A) = 0 implies ν(A)=0\nu(A) = 0.

Measures μ\mu and ν\nu are mutually singular (written μ⊥ν\mu \perp \nu) if there exists A∈FA \in \mathcal{F} such that μ(A)=0\mu(A) = 0 and ν(Ac)=0\nu(A^c) = 0.

Proposition 9.1 (Basic Properties). Let μ,ν,λ\mu, \nu, \lambda be measures on (X,F)(X, \mathcal{F}).

  • If ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu and μ≪λ\mu \ll \lambda, then ν≪λ\nu \ll \lambda.
  • If ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu and ν⊥μ\nu \perp \mu, then ν=0\nu = 0.
  • If ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu and μ\mu is σ\sigma-finite, then ν\nu is σ\sigma-finite.

Theorem 9.2 (Radon-Nikodym Theorem). Let (X,F,μ)(X, \mathcal{F}, \mu) be a σ\sigma-finite measure space and ν\nu a σ\sigma-finite signed measure with ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu. Then there exists a unique (a.e.) measurable function f:X→Rf : X \to \mathbb{R} such that

ν(A)=∫Af dμfor all A∈F\nu(A) = \int_A f\, d\mu \quad \text{for all } A \in \mathcal{F}

This function ff is denoted dν/dμd\nu/d\mu and called the Radon-Nikodym derivative of ν\nu with respect to μ\mu.

Proof sketch. For the finite case, consider the set of functions gg with ∫Ag dμ≤ν(A)\int_A g\, d\mu \leq \nu(A) for all AA. Let α=sup⁡{∫Xg dμ}\alpha = \sup\{\int_X g\, d\mu\} and choose a maximizing sequence gng_n. The pointwise supremum f=sup⁡ngnf = \sup_n g_n gives the desired derivative. Extend to σ\sigma-finite case by partitioning XX into sets of finite measure.

9.3 Properties of the Radon-Nikodym Derivative

Section titled “9.3 Properties of the Radon-Nikodym Derivative”

Proposition 9.3 (Linearity). If ν1,ν2≪μ\nu_1, \nu_2 \ll \mu and a,b∈Ra, b \in \mathbb{R}, then:

d(aν1+bν2)dμ=adν1dμ+bdν2dμ\frac{d(a\nu_1 + b\nu_2)}{d\mu} = a\frac{d\nu_1}{d\mu} + b\frac{d\nu_2}{d\mu}

Proposition 9.4 (Chain Rule). If λ≪ν\lambda \ll \nu and ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu, then λ≪μ\lambda \ll \mu and:

dλdμ=dλdν⋅dνdμμ-a.e.\frac{d\lambda}{d\mu} = \frac{d\lambda}{d\nu} \cdot \frac{d\nu}{d\mu} \quad \mu\text{-a.e.}

Proposition 9.5 (Change of Variables). If ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu and ff is ν\nu-integrable, then:

∫f dν=∫fdνdμ dμ\int f\, d\nu = \int f \frac{d\nu}{d\mu}\, d\mu

Example 9.1. If ν\nu is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure mm on R\mathbb{R}, then dν/dmd\nu/dm is the Radon-Nikodym derivative. For a probability distribution with density p(x)p(x), we have ν(A)=∫Ap(x) dx\nu(A) = \int_A p(x)\, dx, so dν/dm=pd\nu/dm = p.

Example 9.2. The Dirac measure δ0\delta_0 is not absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure: δ0≪m\delta_0 \ll m would require δ0({0})=1=∫{0}f dm=0\delta_0(\{0\}) = 1 = \int_{\{0\}} f\, dm = 0, a contradiction. In fact, δ0⊥m\delta_0 \perp m (take A={0}A = \{0\}, then m(A)=0m(A) = 0, δ0(Ac)=0\delta_0(A^c) = 0).

Theorem 9.6 (Lebesgue Decomposition). Let μ\mu and ν\nu be σ\sigma-finite measures on (X,F)(X, \mathcal{F}). Then there exist unique measures νa\nu_a and νs\nu_s such that:

  1. ν=νa+νs\nu = \nu_a + \nu_s.
  2. νa≪μ\nu_a \ll \mu (absolutely continuous part).
  3. νs⊥μ\nu_s \perp \mu (singular part).

Proof sketch. Let λ=μ+ν\lambda = \mu + \nu. Apply Radon-Nikodym to ν≪λ\nu \ll \lambda to get f=dν/dλf = d\nu/d\lambda. Then set νa(A)=∫Af dμ\nu_a(A) = \int_A f\, d\mu and νs=ν−νa\nu_s = \nu - \nu_a. Show that νs\nu_s is singular with respect to μ\mu by considering the set where f=0f = 0 or f≥1f \geq 1 and using the properties of the derivative.

Example 9.3. The Cantor function F:[0,1]→[0,1]F : [0, 1] \to [0, 1] is continuous, monotonically increasing, and has F(0)=0F(0) = 0, F(1)=1F(1) = 1. The associated measure μF\mu_F (the Cantor measure or “Devil’s staircase” measure) is singular with respect to Lebesgue measure: μF⊥m\mu_F \perp m. By Lebesgue decomposition, μF=μF+0\mu_F = \mu_F + 0 with μF⊥m\mu_F \perp m.

Example 9.4 (Absolutely Continuous Part of a Measure). Let ν\nu be a measure on R\mathbb{R} defined by ν(A)=m(A∩[0,1])+∑q∈Q∩[0,1]2−qδq(A)\nu(A) = m(A \cap [0,1]) + \sum_{q \in \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1]} 2^{-q} \delta_q(A). Then the Lebesgue decomposition of ν\nu with respect to mm is: νa(A)=m(A∩[0,1])\nu_a(A) = m(A \cap [0,1]), νs(A)=∑q∈Q∩[0,1]2−qδq(A)\nu_s(A) = \sum_{q \in \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1]} 2^{-q} \delta_q(A).

Example 9.5 (Conditional Expectation). In probability theory, the conditional expectation E[X∣G]\mathbb{E}[X | \mathcal{G}] can be defined via the Radon-Nikodym derivative. Given a sub-σ\sigma-algebra G⊆F\mathcal{G} \subseteq \mathcal{F}, define ν(G)=∫GX dP\nu(G) = \int_G X\, dP for G∈GG \in \mathcal{G}. Then ν≪P∣G\nu \ll P|_\mathcal{G}, and E[X∣G]=dν/d(P∣G)\mathbb{E}[X | \mathcal{G}] = d\nu/d(P|_\mathcal{G}).

Application: Differentiation of Measures. The Radon-Nikodym theorem is essential for the differentiation of measures on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. The Lebesgue differentiation theorem states that for a locally integrable function ff:

lim⁡r→01m(Br(x))∫Br(x)f dm=f(x)a.e.\lim_{r \to 0} \frac{1}{m(B_r(x))} \int_{B_r(x)} f\, dm = f(x) \quad \text{a.e.}

This is intimately connected with the Radon-Nikodym derivative of the measure ν(A)=∫Af dm\nu(A) = \int_A f\, dm.

9.6 The Radon-Nikodym Property in Banach Spaces

Section titled “9.6 The Radon-Nikodym Property in Banach Spaces”

Definition. A Banach space XX has the Radon-Nikodym property if for every finite measure space (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mu) and every vector measure ν:F→X\nu : \mathcal{F} \to X that is absolutely continuous with respect to μ\mu and has bounded variation, there exists f∈L1(μ,X)f \in L^1(\mu, X) such that ν(A)=∫Af dμ\nu(A) = \int_A f\, d\mu.

Proposition 9.7. Every separable dual space has the Radon-Nikodym property. In particular, ℓ1\ell^1, ℓ∞\ell^\infty, and L∞L^\infty do not have this property.

Problem 1. Let μ\mu be Lebesgue measure on [0,1][0,1] and ν(A)=∫Ax2 dμ\nu(A) = \int_A x^2\, d\mu. Find dν/dμd\nu/d\mu.

Solution. By definition, ν(A)=∫Af dμ\nu(A) = \int_A f\, d\mu with f(x)=x2f(x) = x^2, so dν/dμ(x)=x2d\nu/d\mu(x) = x^2. ■\blacksquare

Problem 2. Decompose ν=δ0+m\nu = \delta_0 + m (where mm is Lebesgue measure on R\mathbb{R}) into absolutely continuous and singular parts with respect to mm.

Solution. νa=m\nu_a = m (since m≪mm \ll m) and νs=δ0\nu_s = \delta_0 (since δ0⊥m\delta_0 \perp m). Indeed, ν=m+δ0\nu = m + \delta_0 with m≪mm \ll m and δ0⊥m\delta_0 \perp m. ■\blacksquare

  1. Prove that if ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu and μ≪ν\mu \ll \nu, then dν/dμ>0d\nu/d\mu > 0 μ\mu-a.e. and dμ/dν=(dν/dμ)−1d\mu/d\nu = (d\nu/d\mu)^{-1}.
  2. Show that the Radon-Nikodym derivative is unique up to μ\mu-null sets.
  3. Find the Lebesgue decomposition of ν(A)=∫Ae−x2 dx+∑n=1∞2−nδn(A)\nu(A) = \int_A e^{-x^2}\, dx + \sum_{n=1}^\infty 2^{-n} \delta_n(A) with respect to Lebesgue measure.
  4. Prove that if μ\mu and ν\nu are σ\sigma-finite and ν≪μ\nu \ll \mu, then ∫f dν=∫f(dν/dμ) dμ\int f\, d\nu = \int f (d\nu/d\mu)\, d\mu for all measurable f≥0f \geq 0.