Polynomial Rings
10.1 Definition and Basic Properties
Section titled “10.1 Definition and Basic Properties”The polynomial ring consists of all formal sums with . It is a ring under the usual addition and multiplication of polynomials.
Theorem 10.1 (Division Algorithm). If is a field and with Then There exist unique such that with or .
Theorem 10.2 (Factor Theorem). is a root of if and only if divides .
Proposition 10.3. A polynomial of degree over a field has at most roots (counting multiplicity).
10.2 Irreducible Polynomials
Section titled “10.2 Irreducible Polynomials”A non-constant polynomial is irreducible if it cannot be factored as With both and of degree less than .
Proposition 10.4. Every polynomial in factors uniquely into irreducible polynomials (up to Reordering and multiplication by units).
Theorem 10.5 (Eisenstein”s Criterion). Let . If there exists a prime such that:
- divides .
- does not divide .
- does not divide .
Then is irreducible in .
Proof. Suppose with (by Gauss’s lemma), , . Modulo : in . Since is an integral domain, And for some . In particular, the constant terms of and are both divisible by . But then divides Contradicting condition (3).
10.3 Worked Examples
Section titled “10.3 Worked Examples”Problem. Show that is irreducible in but reducible in .
Solution
Solution. In : if with Then and Giving Which has no real solution. So is irreducible In .
In : .
Problem. Use the Euclidean algorithm to compute in .
Solution
Solution. Apply the division algorithm:
Since is a non-zero constant (a unit in ), the polynomials are coprime: .
Problem. Show that is irreducible in .
Solution
Solution. By the rational root theorem, possible rational roots are . , , , . No rational roots.
Since If is reducible, it must have an irreducible factor of degree or . No degree- factor means no rational root. We check for degree- factors by reducing modulo : in . , So no roots in . The only irreducible quadratic in is . Division gives So does not divide .
Thus has no factor of degree or So is irreducible in .
10.4 Key Relationships
Section titled “10.4 Key Relationships”- If is a field extension, then is a subring of .
- For a field , the polynomial ring is a Euclidean domain, hence a PID and a UFD.
- If is a UFD, then is a UFD (Gauss’s lemma extends unique factorisation).
- If is a PID, then is a UFD but generally not a PID.
- The degree map is a Euclidean valuation.
10.5 Common Pitfalls
Section titled “10.5 Common Pitfalls”- Assuming that irreducibility in implies irreducibility in for an extension . The polynomial is irreducible over but reducible over .
- Forgetting that Eisenstein’s criterion requires the leading coefficient not to be divisible by . If the criterion gives no information about reducibility.
- Confusing the polynomial ring with the ring of formal power series . In every element is a unit except those with zero constant term.
- Neglecting to check that a proposed factorisation respects the coefficient ring. Over , a factorisation into monic polynomials in may not lie in .
10.6 Applications
Section titled “10.6 Applications”- Coding theory: BCH and Reed-Solomon codes are constructed using polynomial rings over finite fields .
- Cryptography: The ring where is irreducible gives a finite field , used in elliptic curve cryptography.
- Algebraic geometry: The coordinate ring of an affine variety is a quotient of a polynomial ring.
- Signal processing: The discrete Fourier transform can be viewed as evaluating a polynomial at roots of unity.
10.7 Worked Example: Irreducibility via Substitution
Section titled “10.7 Worked Example: Irreducibility via Substitution”Problem. Show that is irreducible in .
Solution
By Eisenstein with : but (leading coefficient) and (constant term). So is irreducible in .